PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGGO vs. FIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGGO vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGO achieves a 15.18% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's -0.02% return.


CGGO

1D
1.04%
1M
-2.11%
6M
9.10%
YTD
15.18%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.74%

FIXT

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.88%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
-0.02%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$57.79M$52.80M$52.76M
$753.53K$1.08M$852.15K

CGGO vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGGO and FIXT is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGGO vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGGO
CGGO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CGGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGGO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
CGGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGGO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FIXT
FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGGO vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGGOFIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.12

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

0.85

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.44

2.12

+5.32

CGGO vs. FIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the FIXT Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGGO and FIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGGO vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGO and FIXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGGOFIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.90%

-3.02%

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.15%

-3.02%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.29%

-2.13%

-4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-0.84%

-4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

1.21%

+2.37%

Volatility

CGGO vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) at 1.12%. This indicates that CGGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGGOFIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

1.12%

+6.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.35%

2.69%

+15.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.44%

3.58%

+16.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

3.76%

+15.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

3.76%

+15.42%

CGGO vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGGO vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

CGGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than FIXT's 5.66% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGGO
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
1.00%2.03%1.10%0.76%0.59%
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF
5.66%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGGO and FIXT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGGO has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to FIXT (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGGO dropped -24.90% vs FIXT's -3.02%.

On 1-year performance, CGGO leads with 26.58% vs 2.57% for FIXT. On fees, CGGO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGGO has performed better with a 26.58% return vs 2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGGO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 1.00% for CGGO.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGGO and 0.75% for FIXT.

CGGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGGO and FIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer