CGGO vs. FIXT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGGO (Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF) and FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CGGO is actively managed, while FIXT is passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGGO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FIXT.

Performance

CGGO vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGO achieves a 19.37% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 0.23% return.

CGGO

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 9.97%
• YTD: 19.37%
• 6M: 20.83%
• 1Y: 37.51%
• 3Y*: 21.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FIXT

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.23%
• 6M: 0.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGO vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF	19.37%	13.21%
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	0.23%	4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGO and FIXT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025	0.34

CGGO vs. FIXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGGO	FIXT
Technology	37.3%	-
Industrials	14.0%	-
Financial Services	10.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	-
Communication Services	8.1%	-
Healthcare	5.4%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	-
Basic Materials	4.4%	-
Energy	1.4%	-
Utilities	1.3%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

CGGO vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGO

CGGO Risk / Return Rank: 65
CGGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CGGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CGGO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CGGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
CGGO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGO vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGGO	FIXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.04	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGO	FIXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	1.34	-0.55

Drawdowns

CGGO vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGO and FIXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGO	FIXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.90%	-3.02%	-21.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-1.88%	+1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.50%	-0.71%	-4.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGO	FIXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.68%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.40%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.77%	3.77%	+13.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.56%	3.77%	+14.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.56%	3.77%	+14.79%

CGGO vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGO vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

CGGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than FIXT's 5.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF	1.70%	2.03%	1.10%	0.76%	0.59%
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	5.55%	3.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGO and FIXT in my portfolio?

CGGO and FIXT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGGO or FIXT?

On fees, CGGO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGO or FIXT?

CGGO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGO or FIXT?

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 1.70% for CGGO.

What is the main difference between CGGO and FIXT?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGGO and 0.75% for FIXT.