CGGO vs. AVGV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CGGO (Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF) and AVGV (Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGGO returned 32.98% vs 33.82% for AVGV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGGO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for AVGV.

Performance

CGGO vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGO achieves a 18.47% return, which is significantly higher than AVGV's 16.44% return.

CGGO

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.29%
• YTD: 18.47%
• 6M: 17.68%
• 1Y: 32.98%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVGV

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 16.44%
• 6M: 15.20%
• 1Y: 33.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGO vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF	18.47%	21.08%	14.80%	7.56%
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	16.44%	22.57%	11.26%	11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGO and AVGV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.79

The correlation between CGGO and AVGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGGO vs. AVGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGGO	AVGV
Technology	40.3%	12.1%
Industrials	13.6%	16.2%
Financial Services	9.7%	21.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	14.7%
Healthcare	8.6%	4.5%
Communication Services	7.1%	5.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	5.2%
Basic Materials	3.2%	7.2%
Energy	1.7%	12.4%
Utilities	0.8%	0.7%
Real Estate	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

CGGO vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGO

CGGO Risk / Return Rank: 60
CGGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CGGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CGGO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CGGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
CGGO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

AVGV

AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 86
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGO vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGGO	AVGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.54	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	3.52	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.45	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	4.18	-1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.05	16.23	-5.18

CGGO vs. AVGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the AVGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGGO and AVGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGGO vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, which is greater than AVGV's maximum drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGO and AVGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGO	AVGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.90%	-17.03%	-7.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.15%	-8.12%	-5.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.62%	-2.02%	-1.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-2.27%	-3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	2.09%	+0.90%

Volatility

CGGO vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) has a higher volatility of 9.80% compared to Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) at 4.54%. This indicates that CGGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGGO	AVGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.80%	4.54%	+5.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.78%	10.45%	+6.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.88%	13.40%	+5.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.99%	15.02%	+3.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.99%	15.02%	+3.97%

CGGO vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGO vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison

CGGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than AVGV's 2.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	2.49%	1.98%	2.32%	1.14%	0.00%
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF	1.71%	2.03%	1.10%	0.76%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGO and AVGV in my portfolio?

CGGO and AVGV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGGO or AVGV?

CGGO has higher volatility (9.80%) compared to AVGV (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGGO dropped -24.90% vs AVGV's -17.03%.

Which ETF is better, CGGO or AVGV?

On 1-year performance, AVGV leads with 33.82% vs 32.98% for CGGO. On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, AVGV has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGGO or AVGV?

Over the 1-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 33.82% return vs 32.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGO or AVGV?

AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGO or AVGV?

AVGV has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.71% for CGGO.

What is the main difference between CGGO and AVGV?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGGO and 0.26% for AVGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.