CGG.TO vs. AII.TO

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. (CGG.TO) and Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO).

Performance

CGG.TO vs. AII.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. (CGG.TO) and Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGG.TO vs. AII.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGG.TO China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.	4.24%	275.00%	33.51%	52.96%	22.48%	94.07%	54.24%	-25.32%	-32.77%	18.69%
AII.TO Almonty Industries Inc.	77.22%	784.25%	68.52%	-20.59%	-23.60%	39.06%	52.38%	-35.38%	18.18%	103.70%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CGG.TO : CA$11.41B AII.TO : CA$5.62B
EPS CGG.TO : CA$1.18 AII.TO : -CA$0.75
PS Ratio CGG.TO : 8.71 AII.TO : 142.39
PB Ratio CGG.TO : 4.94 AII.TO : 15.71
Total Revenue (TTM) CGG.TO : CA$1.31B AII.TO : CA$32.51M
Gross Profit (TTM) CGG.TO : CA$676.87M AII.TO : CA$2.38M
EBITDA (TTM) CGG.TO : CA$742.22M AII.TO : -CA$156.37M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGG.TO achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly lower than AII.TO's 77.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CGG.TO has underperformed AII.TO with an annualized return of 32.18%, while AII.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 46.18% annualized return.

CGG.TO

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -11.52%
• YTD: 4.24%
• 6M: 11.94%
• 1Y: 197.15%
• 3Y*: 84.50%
• 5Y*: 56.83%
• 10Y*: 32.18%

AII.TO

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: -19.07%
• YTD: 77.22%
• 6M: 149.88%
• 1Y: 563.26%
• 3Y*: 178.52%
• 5Y*: 68.82%
• 10Y*: 46.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CGG.TO vs. AII.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGG.TO

CGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
CGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

AII.TO

AII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
AII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
AII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
AII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
AII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGG.TO vs. AII.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. (CGG.TO) and Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGG.TO	AII.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.27	6.28	-3.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	4.34	-1.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.54	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.48	13.30	-8.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.57	29.59	-15.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGG.TO vs. AII.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is lower than the AII.TO Sharpe Ratio of 6.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGG.TO and AII.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGG.TO	AII.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.27	6.28	-3.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.14	1.04	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.64	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.00	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between CGG.TO and AII.TO is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CGG.TO vs. AII.TO - Dividend Comparison

CGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while AII.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CGG.TO China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.	0.39%	0.40%	0.00%	8.87%	8.06%	4.42%
AII.TO Almonty Industries Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CGG.TO vs. AII.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.81%, which is greater than AII.TO's maximum drawdown of -80.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGG.TO and AII.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGG.TO	AII.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.81%	-80.14%	-12.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.05%	-43.53%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.99%	-66.14%	+18.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.47%	-68.52%	-18.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.19%	-29.45%	-3.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.53%	-33.31%	-18.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.55%	19.57%	-6.02%

Volatility

CGG.TO vs. AII.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. (CGG.TO) is 18.79%, while Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) has a volatility of 28.46%. This indicates that CGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AII.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGG.TO	AII.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.79%	28.46%	-9.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.52%	69.24%	-24.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.62%	90.55%	-29.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.51%	66.68%	-16.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.82%	72.71%	-14.89%

Financials