PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGFIX vs. AEMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGFIX vs. AEMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX) and abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGFIX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than AEMSX's 32.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CGFIX has underperformed AEMSX with an annualized return of 1.88%, while AEMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.


CGFIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.22%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
1.88%

AEMSX

1D
-0.54%
1M
8.31%
YTD
32.71%
6M
34.85%
1Y
63.05%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGFIX vs. AEMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGFIX
abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund
1.26%5.79%4.85%-2.54%-9.99%1.39%6.37%7.26%0.97%1.62%
AEMSX
abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc
32.71%32.19%3.81%6.49%-26.28%7.03%27.52%20.24%-14.71%29.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CGFIX and AEMSX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.14

The correlation between CGFIX and AEMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (5 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGFIX vs. AEMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGFIX
CGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

AEMSX
AEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGFIX vs. AEMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX) and abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGFIXAEMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.63

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

4.75

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

18.77

-10.30

CGFIX vs. AEMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the AEMSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGFIX and AEMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGFIXAEMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

3.41

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.41

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.56

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.41

+0.49

Drawdowns

CGFIX vs. AEMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGFIX drawdown since its inception was -20.28%, smaller than the maximum AEMSX drawdown of -38.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGFIX and AEMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGFIXAEMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.28%

-38.58%

+18.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.78%

-13.70%

+10.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.09%

-18.72%

+11.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.28%

-36.65%

+16.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.28%

-38.58%

+18.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-0.54%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-12.57%

+9.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

3.46%

-2.69%

Volatility

CGFIX vs. AEMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX) is 1.09%, while abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc (AEMSX) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that CGFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGFIXAEMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

8.93%

-7.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

16.56%

-14.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14%

19.09%

-15.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

18.71%

-12.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.71%

18.69%

-13.98%

CGFIX vs. AEMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGFIX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than AEMSX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGFIX vs. AEMSX - Dividend Comparison

CGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, more than AEMSX's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEMSX
abrdn Emerging Markets Instl Svc
4.63%6.14%0.95%1.39%1.83%22.97%0.68%1.82%1.57%1.09%1.08%2.32%
CGFIX
abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund
6.15%5.51%6.43%2.08%0.00%7.49%0.23%3.29%6.05%0.33%1.12%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGFIX and AEMSX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEMSX has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to CGFIX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGFIX dropped -20.28% vs AEMSX's -38.58%.

AEMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGFIX and AEMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer