CGDV vs. TSPA

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) and TSPA (T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while TSPA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGDV returned 22.33%/yr vs 20.03%/yr for TSPA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGDV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for TSPA.

Performance

CGDV vs. TSPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 12.11% return, which is significantly higher than TSPA's 9.75% return.

CGDV

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -0.40%
• 6M: 9.82%
• YTD: 12.11%
• 1Y: 21.34%
• 3Y*: 22.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.22%

TSPA

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -1.03%
• 6M: 8.25%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 1Y: 19.66%
• 3Y*: 20.03%
• 5Y*: 13.44%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDV vs. TSPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	12.11%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-0.44%
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF	9.75%	16.44%	26.37%	29.95%	-8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDV and TSPA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.90

The correlation between CGDV and TSPA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGDV vs. TSPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGDV	TSPA
Technology	34.5%	35.9%
Industrials	13.6%	8.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.6%	10.0%
Communication Services	9.8%	11.3%
Healthcare	8.2%	8.6%
Financial Services	6.7%	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	4.7%
Energy	3.9%	3.6%
Basic Materials	2.8%	1.8%
Utilities	1.0%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.7%

Return for Risk

CGDV vs. TSPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 70
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

TSPA

TSPA Risk / Return Rank: 61
TSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 59
TSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDV vs. TSPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGDV	TSPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.49	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.10	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.27	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	2.14	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.17	9.38	+0.79

CGDV vs. TSPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the TSPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDV and TSPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGDV vs. TSPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum TSPA drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and TSPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGDV	TSPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.82%	-24.72%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-9.24%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.28%	-19.04%	+4.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.72%	-2.07%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.54%	-5.40%	+1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	2.10%	0.00%

Volatility

CGDV vs. TSPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is 3.20%, while T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that CGDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGDV	TSPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	3.96%	-0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.12%	10.71%	-0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.41%	13.24%	-0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.50%	17.10%	-1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.50%	16.98%	-1.48%

CGDV vs. TSPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than TSPA's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGDV vs. TSPA - Dividend Comparison

CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than TSPA's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.20%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF	0.57%	0.62%	0.50%	0.41%	1.16%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGDV and TSPA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, CGDV and TSPA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CGDV or TSPA?

TSPA has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to CGDV (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs TSPA's -24.72%.

Which ETF is better, CGDV or TSPA?

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 22.33% vs 20.03% for TSPA. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGDV or TSPA?

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 22.33% return vs 20.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGDV or TSPA?

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for TSPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGDV or TSPA?

CGDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.57% for TSPA.

What is the main difference between CGDV and TSPA?

CGDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TSPA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGDV and 0.34% for TSPA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.