CGDV vs. PSEC
CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while PSEC (Prospect Capital Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CGDV returned 24.15%/yr vs -16.85%/yr for PSEC. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGDV vs. PSEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than PSEC's -3.27% return.
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 28.33%
- 3Y*
- 24.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSEC
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- -3.27%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- -14.85%
- 3Y*
- -16.85%
- 5Y*
- -13.87%
- 10Y*
- 0.41%
CGDV vs. PSEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 11.55% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -0.44% |
PSEC Prospect Capital Corporation | -3.27% | -28.86% | -18.16% | -4.13% | -4.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGDV and PSEC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.50 |
The correlation between CGDV and PSEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGDV vs. PSEC — Risk / Return Rank
CGDV
PSEC
CGDV vs. PSEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGDV | PSEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.94 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | -0.63 | +3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.19 | -1.13 | +14.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGDV vs. PSEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum PSEC drawdown of -61.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and PSEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGDV | PSEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -61.51% | +39.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -27.04% | +17.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -50.64% | +36.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -53.33% | +52.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.60% | -15.65% | +12.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 15.04% | -12.95% |
Volatility
CGDV vs. PSEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is 4.52%, while Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that CGDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGDV | PSEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 10.61% | -6.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 27.53% | -17.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 33.82% | -21.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 28.06% | -12.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 27.36% | -11.79% |
Dividends
CGDV vs. PSEC - Dividend Comparison
CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than PSEC's 22.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSEC Prospect Capital Corporation | 22.94% | 20.85% | 16.01% | 12.02% | 10.30% | 8.56% | 13.31% | 11.18% | 11.41% | 13.45% | 11.98% | 14.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGDV and PSEC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSEC has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to CGDV (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs PSEC's -61.51%.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGDV and PSEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer