PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGDV vs. CGCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGDV vs. CGCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than CGCV's 6.45% return.


CGDV

1D
0.68%
1M
5.08%
YTD
12.65%
6M
13.07%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
25.65%
5Y*
10Y*

CGCV

1D
0.47%
1M
2.73%
YTD
6.45%
6M
6.68%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDV vs. CGCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
12.65%25.50%7.74%
CGCV
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
6.45%16.62%7.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDV and CGCV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024

0.91

The correlation between CGDV and CGCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGDV vs. CGCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGDV
CGCV

Technology

34.1%
23.6%

Industrials

13.2%
9.9%

Healthcare

11.5%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
7.0%

Communication Services

8.4%
4.9%

Financial Services

6.8%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
10.0%

Energy

3.8%
5.4%

Basic Materials

2.9%
2.9%

Utilities

2.1%
8.6%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.8%

Technology

CGDV
34.1%
CGCV
23.6%

Industrials

CGDV
13.2%
CGCV
9.9%

Healthcare

CGDV
11.5%
CGCV
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CGDV
10.6%
CGCV
7.0%

Communication Services

CGDV
8.4%
CGCV
4.9%

Financial Services

CGDV
6.8%
CGCV
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

CGDV
5.5%
CGCV
10.0%

Energy

CGDV
3.8%
CGCV
5.4%

Basic Materials

CGDV
2.9%
CGCV
2.9%

Utilities

CGDV
2.1%
CGCV
8.6%

Real Estate

CGDV
1.1%
CGCV
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGDV vs. CGCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CGCV
CGCV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CGCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDV vs. CGCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGDVCGCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.33

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.21

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.36

8.94

+6.42

CGDV vs. CGCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the CGCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDV and CGCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGDVCGCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

1.81

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Drawdowns

CGDV vs. CGCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, which is greater than CGCV's maximum drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and CGCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGDVCGCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.82%

-13.13%

-8.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-7.93%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-1.67%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.96%

+0.10%

Volatility

CGDV vs. CGCV - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) at 2.39%. This indicates that CGDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGDVCGCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.39%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

7.46%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

9.72%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

12.64%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.48%

12.64%

+2.84%

CGDV vs. CGCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CGDV and CGCV have an expense ratio of 0.33%.


Dividends

CGDV vs. CGCV - Dividend Comparison

CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than CGCV's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGCV
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
1.45%1.44%0.68%0.00%0.00%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.16%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGDV and CGCV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGDV has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to CGCV (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs CGCV's -13.13%.

On 1-year performance, CGDV leads with 31.52% vs 17.48% for CGCV. Both ETFs have the same 0.33% expense ratio. On volatility, CGCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 31.52% return vs 17.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGDV and CGCV have the same expense ratio: 0.33% per year.

CGCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.16% for CGDV.

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGDV and CGCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer