PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGDG vs. DFAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGDG vs. DFAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGDG vs. DFAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
1.58%22.74%11.52%9.54%
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
4.03%34.04%4.68%9.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDG achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than DFAI's 4.03% return.


CGDG

1D
0.45%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
1.58%
6M
4.35%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFAI

1D
1.49%
1M
-4.63%
YTD
4.03%
6M
9.10%
1Y
29.81%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGDG vs. DFAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDG has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAI's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGDG vs. DFAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDG
CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAI
DFAI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDG vs. DFAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGDGDFAIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

1.79

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

2.44

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.74

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.71

10.73

-2.02

CGDG vs. DFAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the DFAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDG and DFAI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGDGDFAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.79

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.75

+0.76

Correlation

The correlation between CGDG and DFAI is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGDG vs. DFAI - Dividend Comparison

CGDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than DFAI's 2.37% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
1.94%1.95%2.15%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
2.37%2.45%2.72%2.64%2.72%2.06%0.09%

Drawdowns

CGDG vs. DFAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDG drawdown since its inception was -10.52%, smaller than the maximum DFAI drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDG and DFAI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGDGDFAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.52%

-27.44%

+16.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-10.95%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.61%

-6.23%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-5.21%

+3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.79%

-0.60%

Volatility

CGDG vs. DFAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) is 4.64%, while Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that CGDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGDGDFAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

6.97%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

10.65%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.10%

16.73%

-2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.22%

15.81%

-3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.22%

15.66%

-3.44%