PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGCV vs. DFRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGCV vs. DFRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGCV vs. DFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGCV
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
-1.62%16.62%7.44%
DFRA
Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF
10.68%6.64%1.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGCV achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than DFRA's 10.68% return.


CGCV

1D
0.17%
1M
-5.85%
YTD
-1.62%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
11.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFRA

1D
1.52%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
10.68%
6M
11.86%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGCV vs. DFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGCV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than DFRA's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGCV vs. DFRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGCV
CGCV Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CGCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

DFRA
DFRA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGCV vs. DFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGCVDFRADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

0.87

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

1.28

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.12

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.86

4.52

+0.34

CGCV vs. DFRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGCV Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the DFRA Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGCV and DFRA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGCVDFRADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

0.87

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.73

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between CGCV and DFRA is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGCV vs. DFRA - Dividend Comparison

CGCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than DFRA's 4.12% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
CGCV
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
1.57%1.44%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFRA
Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF
4.12%2.86%10.13%4.70%8.40%0.08%

Drawdowns

CGCV vs. DFRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGCV drawdown since its inception was -13.13%, smaller than the maximum DFRA drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCV and DFRA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGCVDFRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-19.35%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-14.67%

+4.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.97%

-5.53%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-3.91%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

3.63%

-1.19%

Volatility

CGCV vs. DFRA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is 4.11%, while Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that CGCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGCVDFRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

6.81%

-2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

11.88%

-4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

18.56%

-4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

17.59%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.87%

17.59%

-4.72%