PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGCV vs. CGUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGCV vs. CGUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) and Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGCV vs. CGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGCV
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
-1.79%16.62%7.44%
CGUS
Capital Group Core Equity ETF
-4.27%16.21%8.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGCV achieves a -1.79% return, which is significantly higher than CGUS's -4.27% return.


CGCV

1D
1.96%
1M
-6.13%
YTD
-1.79%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGUS

1D
3.17%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
-4.27%
6M
-2.35%
1Y
16.18%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGCV vs. CGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CGCV and CGUS have an expense ratio of 0.33%.


Return for Risk

CGCV vs. CGUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGCV
CGCV Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CGCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CGUS
CGUS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGCV vs. CGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) and Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGCVCGUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

0.91

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.52

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.22

6.49

-1.27

CGCV vs. CGUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGCV Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the CGUS Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGCV and CGUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGCVCGUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

0.91

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.77

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between CGCV and CGUS is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGCV vs. CGUS - Dividend Comparison

CGCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than CGUS's 1.00% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
CGCV
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
1.57%1.44%0.68%0.00%0.00%
CGUS
Capital Group Core Equity ETF
1.00%0.95%1.02%1.22%1.10%

Drawdowns

CGCV vs. CGUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGCV drawdown since its inception was -13.13%, smaller than the maximum CGUS drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCV and CGUS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGCVCGUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-21.86%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-11.11%

+0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-6.73%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-4.81%

+3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.59%

-0.18%

Volatility

CGCV vs. CGUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is 4.19%, while Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that CGCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGCVCGUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

5.83%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

9.93%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

17.88%

-3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.89%

16.55%

-3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.89%

16.55%

-3.66%