CGCP vs. USO
CGCP (Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - CGCP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. CGCP is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGCP returned 4.94%/yr vs 20.97%/yr for USO. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CGCP charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
CGCP vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGCP achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 86.77% return.
CGCP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- 2.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.43%
USO
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 24.23%
- 6M
- 62.44%
- YTD
- 86.77%
- 1Y
- 66.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.64%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.29M | $29.41M | $33.98M | |
| $968.42M | $871.56M | $931.57M |
CGCP vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | -0.44% | 7.35% | 2.95% | 7.17% | -9.68% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 86.77% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 5.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGCP and USO is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | -0.12 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CGCP and USO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.12 to -0.45, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGCP vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
CGCP
USO
CGCP vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGCP | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.25 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.93 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | 5.60 | -2.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGCP vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGCP drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCP and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGCP | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -98.19% | +83.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.59% | -32.49% | +29.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.52% | -32.49% | +27.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -86.26% | +84.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -75.38% | +70.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 12.03% | -11.11% |
Volatility
CGCP vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) is 1.04%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that CGCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGCP | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 17.73% | -16.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.98% | 42.79% | -39.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 46.91% | -43.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 37.06% | -30.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 39.29% | -33.01% |
CGCP vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGCP has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGCP vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
CGCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 5.16% | 5.10% | 5.17% | 4.98% | 2.96% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGCP and USO have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (17.73%) compared to CGCP (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGCP dropped -15.06% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 3-year performance, USO leads with 20.97% vs 4.94% for CGCP. On fees, CGCP is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, CGCP has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, USO has performed better with a 20.97% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGCP is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
CGCP has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
CGCP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CGCP and 0.86% for USO.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGCP and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer