CGCP vs. KDRN
CGCP (Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF) and KDRN (Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGCP returned 5.07%/yr vs 3.47%/yr for KDRN. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGCP charges 0.34%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for KDRN.
Performance
CGCP vs. KDRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGCP achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than KDRN's 1.11% return.
CGCP
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KDRN
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGCP vs. KDRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 0.33% | 7.35% | 2.95% | 7.17% | -9.78% |
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF | 1.11% | 4.65% | 1.30% | 10.06% | -7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGCP and KDRN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between CGCP and KDRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
CGCP vs. KDRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGCP
KDRN
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
CGCP
KDRN
-
Energy
CGCP
KDRN
-
Basic Materials
CGCP
-
KDRN
-
Communication Services
CGCP
-
KDRN
-
Consumer Cyclical
CGCP
-
KDRN
-
Consumer Defensive
CGCP
-
KDRN
-
Financial Services
CGCP
-
KDRN
Healthcare
CGCP
-
KDRN
-
Industrials
CGCP
-
KDRN
-
Technology
CGCP
-
KDRN
-
Utilities
CGCP
-
KDRN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGCP vs. KDRN — Risk / Return Rank
CGCP
KDRN
CGCP vs. KDRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) and Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGCP | KDRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 0.96 | +0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 1.40 | +0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 1.91 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 3.77 | +3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGCP | KDRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 0.96 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.13 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
CGCP vs. KDRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGCP drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, roughly equal to the maximum KDRN drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCP and KDRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGCP | KDRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -15.29% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.59% | -1.77% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.37% | -4.94% | -0.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.92% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -4.77% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.90% | -0.12% |
Volatility
CGCP vs. KDRN - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN) at 0.73%. This indicates that CGCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KDRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGCP | KDRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 0.73% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 2.06% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 3.53% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 6.61% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 6.61% | -0.25% |
CGCP vs. KDRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGCP has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than KDRN's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGCP vs. KDRN - Dividend Comparison
CGCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than KDRN's 3.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 5.16% | 5.10% | 5.17% | 4.98% | 2.96% |
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF | 3.11% | 2.54% | 2.83% | 2.84% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGCP and KDRN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGCP has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to KDRN (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGCP dropped -15.06% vs KDRN's -15.29%.
On 3-year performance, CGCP leads with 5.07% vs 3.47% for KDRN. On fees, CGCP is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, KDRN has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGCP has performed better with a 5.07% return vs 3.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGCP is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for KDRN.
CGCP has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 3.11% for KDRN.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Kingsbarn. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CGCP and 1.09% for KDRN.
CGCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGCP and KDRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer