CGCP vs. EUSB
CGCP (Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF) and EUSB (iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. CGCP is actively managed, while EUSB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGCP returned 5.07%/yr vs 4.27%/yr for EUSB. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGCP charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUSB.
Performance
CGCP vs. EUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGCP achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly higher than EUSB's 0.13% return.
CGCP
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUSB
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- —
CGCP vs. EUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 0.33% | 7.35% | 2.95% | 7.17% | -9.78% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 0.13% | 7.45% | 1.83% | 5.80% | -9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGCP and EUSB is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between CGCP and EUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGCP vs. EUSB — Risk / Return Rank
CGCP
EUSB
CGCP vs. EUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGCP | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.09 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 6.26 | +1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGCP | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.45 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.04 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
CGCP vs. EUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGCP drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum EUSB drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCP and EUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGCP | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -17.87% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.59% | -2.48% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.37% | -5.76% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -1.36% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -6.50% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.82% | -0.04% |
Volatility
CGCP vs. EUSB - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) at 1.17%. This indicates that CGCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGCP | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 1.17% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 2.49% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 3.57% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 5.77% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 5.41% | +0.95% |
CGCP vs. EUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGCP has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSB's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGCP vs. EUSB - Dividend Comparison
CGCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than EUSB's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 5.16% | 5.10% | 5.17% | 4.98% | 2.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.97% | 3.84% | 3.67% | 3.08% | 2.21% | 1.10% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, CGCP and EUSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CGCP has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to EUSB (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGCP dropped -15.06% vs EUSB's -17.87%.
On 3-year performance, CGCP leads with 5.07% vs 4.27% for EUSB. On fees, EUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, EUSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGCP has performed better with a 5.07% return vs 4.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CGCP.
CGCP has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 3.97% for EUSB.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CGCP and 0.12% for EUSB.
CGCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGCP and EUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer