CGCB vs. GIOIX
CGCB (Capital Group Core Bond ETF) and GIOIX (Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund) are both funds - CGCB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group, while GIOIX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Guggenheim. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGCB returned 5.06% vs 6.11% for GIOIX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGCB charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for GIOIX.
Performance
CGCB vs. GIOIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGCB achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than GIOIX's 1.12% return.
CGCB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIOIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.59%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 4.33%
CGCB vs. GIOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCB Capital Group Core Bond ETF | 0.05% | 7.29% | 1.44% | 6.80% |
GIOIX Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund | 1.12% | 7.64% | 7.78% | 5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGCB and GIOIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between CGCB and GIOIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGCB vs. GIOIX — Risk / Return Rank
CGCB
GIOIX
CGCB vs. GIOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) and Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund (GIOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGCB | GIOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.63 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 2.90 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | 13.85 | -8.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGCB | GIOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 2.49 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.73 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
CGCB vs. GIOIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGCB drawdown since its inception was -5.17%, smaller than the maximum GIOIX drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCB and GIOIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGCB | GIOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -13.38% | +8.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.98% | -2.12% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.08% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -1.42% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.44% | +0.54% |
Volatility
CGCB vs. GIOIX - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund (GIOIX) at 0.99%. This indicates that CGCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGCB | GIOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 0.99% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.80% | 2.05% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 2.47% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.39% | 3.18% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.39% | 2.89% | +2.50% |
CGCB vs. GIOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGCB has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than GIOIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGCB vs. GIOIX - Dividend Comparison
CGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than GIOIX's 6.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCB Capital Group Core Bond ETF | 4.22% | 4.22% | 3.99% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIOIX Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund | 6.09% | 5.86% | 5.88% | 6.45% | 3.78% | 3.10% | 3.61% | 3.29% | 3.55% | 3.54% | 5.38% | 5.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGCB and GIOIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGCB has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to GIOIX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGCB dropped -5.17% vs GIOIX's -13.38%.
GIOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGCB and GIOIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer