PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGBIX vs. CISIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGBIX vs. CISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Green Bond Fund (CGBIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGBIX achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than CISIX's 13.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CGBIX has underperformed CISIX with an annualized return of 1.63%, while CISIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.21% annualized return.


CGBIX

1D
0.21%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.86%
YTD
-0.63%
1Y
1.62%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
1.63%
ALL TIME*
2.09%

CISIX

1D
1.52%
1M
1.42%
6M
12.52%
YTD
13.58%
1Y
23.40%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
15.21%
ALL TIME*
7.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CGBIX vs. CISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGBIX
Calvert Green Bond Fund
-0.63%7.90%2.00%6.14%-13.08%-1.66%7.02%8.14%0.68%3.17%
CISIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
13.58%15.90%24.14%27.27%-21.68%25.63%26.12%32.81%-4.08%21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CGBIX and CISIX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013

-0.04

The correlation between CGBIX and CISIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGBIX vs. CISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGBIX
CGBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CGBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CGBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CISIX
CISIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGBIX vs. CISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Green Bond Fund (CGBIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGBIXCISIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.33

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

2.61

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

11.50

-9.90

CGBIX vs. CISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGBIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the CISIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGBIX and CISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGBIX vs. CISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBIX drawdown since its inception was -17.46%, smaller than the maximum CISIX drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBIX and CISIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGBIXCISIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.46%

-59.36%

+41.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-9.72%

+6.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.35%

-19.94%

+15.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.16%

-27.37%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.46%

-32.82%

+15.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

0.00%

-2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-14.20%

+10.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

2.20%

-1.10%

Volatility

CGBIX vs. CISIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Green Bond Fund (CGBIX) is 0.93%, while Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that CGBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGBIXCISIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

3.99%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

10.90%

-8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.31%

13.52%

-10.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

17.93%

-12.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.08%

18.58%

-14.50%

CGBIX vs. CISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGBIX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than CISIX's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGBIX vs. CISIX - Dividend Comparison

CGBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than CISIX's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGBIX
Calvert Green Bond Fund
3.51%4.09%3.49%2.37%1.86%1.99%1.85%2.45%2.26%2.54%3.22%2.01%
CISIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
4.75%5.39%1.77%1.02%1.17%1.02%0.94%1.14%4.33%2.41%3.77%7.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGBIX and CISIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CISIX has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to CGBIX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGBIX dropped -17.46% vs CISIX's -59.36%.

CISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGBIX and CISIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer