PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGBIX vs. CFJIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGBIX vs. CFJIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Green Bond Fund (CGBIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGBIX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than CFJIX's 15.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CGBIX has underperformed CFJIX with an annualized return of 1.89%, while CFJIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.84% annualized return.


CGBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.54%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
1.89%

CFJIX

1D
0.89%
1M
5.68%
YTD
15.07%
6M
16.33%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGBIX vs. CFJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGBIX
Calvert Green Bond Fund
0.40%7.90%2.00%6.14%-13.08%-1.66%7.02%8.14%0.68%3.17%
CFJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund
15.07%16.76%14.63%9.86%-11.70%24.40%9.06%29.36%-10.08%15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CGBIX and CFJIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

-0.04

The correlation between CGBIX and CFJIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGBIX vs. CFJIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGBIX
CGBIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CGBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CGBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

CFJIX
CFJIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CFJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CFJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGBIX vs. CFJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Green Bond Fund (CGBIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGBIXCFJIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.60

2.44

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

3.52

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

3.44

-1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.10

13.35

-7.25

CGBIX vs. CFJIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the CFJIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGBIX and CFJIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGBIXCFJIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.44

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.59

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.66

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.67

-0.09

Drawdowns

CGBIX vs. CFJIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBIX drawdown since its inception was -17.46%, smaller than the maximum CFJIX drawdown of -36.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBIX and CFJIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGBIXCFJIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.46%

-36.91%

+19.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-9.00%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.10%

-16.60%

+11.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.46%

-22.62%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.46%

-36.91%

+19.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

0.00%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-5.10%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

2.31%

-1.40%

Volatility

CGBIX vs. CFJIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Green Bond Fund (CGBIX) is 1.32%, while Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that CGBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFJIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGBIXCFJIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

3.91%

-2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.56%

9.60%

-7.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48%

12.70%

-9.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.96%

15.97%

-11.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.07%

17.99%

-13.92%

CGBIX vs. CFJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGBIX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than CFJIX's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGBIX vs. CFJIX - Dividend Comparison

CGBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than CFJIX's 7.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund
7.96%9.16%6.31%2.07%2.02%4.17%1.88%2.17%4.87%6.79%2.28%0.00%
CGBIX
Calvert Green Bond Fund
3.76%4.09%3.49%2.37%1.86%1.99%1.85%2.45%2.26%2.54%3.22%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGBIX and CFJIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFJIX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to CGBIX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGBIX dropped -17.46% vs CFJIX's -36.91%.

CFJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGBIX and CFJIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer