PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CG1.L vs. ANXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CG1.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (CG1.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CG1.L is traded in GBp, while ANXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANXU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CG1.L achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than ANXU.L's 20.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CG1.L has underperformed ANXU.L with an annualized return of 9.94%, while ANXU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.69% annualized return.


CG1.L

1D
0.55%
1M
2.25%
YTD
0.50%
6M
3.03%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
9.94%

ANXU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
10.24%
YTD
20.95%
6M
19.24%
1Y
42.83%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
22.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CG1.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CG1.L
Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR
0.50%28.47%13.17%17.07%-7.61%7.99%9.33%16.56%-16.89%16.60%
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
20.15%11.32%28.95%48.68%-25.30%28.68%41.33%36.74%4.00%20.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CG1.L and ANXU.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2011

0.44

The correlation between CG1.L and ANXU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CG1.L vs. ANXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CG1.L
ANXU.L

Industrials

33.9%
3.1%

Financial Services

20.8%
0.2%

Technology

14.4%
53.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
12.2%

Communication Services

6.4%
15.8%

Healthcare

5.8%
4.2%

Basic Materials

5.0%
1.1%

Utilities

4.7%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
7.7%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.1%

Energy

-

0.6%

Industrials

CG1.L
33.9%
ANXU.L
3.1%

Financial Services

CG1.L
20.8%
ANXU.L
0.2%

Technology

CG1.L
14.4%
ANXU.L
53.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CG1.L
7.0%
ANXU.L
12.2%

Communication Services

CG1.L
6.4%
ANXU.L
15.8%

Healthcare

CG1.L
5.8%
ANXU.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

CG1.L
5.0%
ANXU.L
1.1%

Utilities

CG1.L
4.7%
ANXU.L
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

CG1.L
1.0%
ANXU.L
7.7%

Real Estate

CG1.L
1.0%
ANXU.L
0.1%

Energy

CG1.L

-

ANXU.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CG1.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CG1.L
CG1.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CG1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CG1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CG1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CG1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CG1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CG1.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (CG1.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CG1.LANXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.47

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

3.83

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

10.84

-9.60

CG1.L vs. ANXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CG1.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CG1.L and ANXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CG1.LANXU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

2.68

-2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.96

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

1.23

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.30

-0.86

Drawdowns

CG1.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CG1.L drawdown since its inception was -34.44%, which is greater than ANXU.L's maximum drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CG1.L and ANXU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CG1.LANXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.44%

-27.52%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.92%

-11.12%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.80%

-24.28%

+10.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

-27.52%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.44%

-27.52%

-6.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.29%

0.00%

-3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-4.99%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

3.94%

+0.11%

Volatility

CG1.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (CG1.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) have volatilities of 4.79% and 5.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CG1.LANXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

5.02%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

11.74%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

15.89%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

20.08%

-3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

21.15%

-3.15%

CG1.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CG1.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CG1.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CG1.L nor ANXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CG1.L and ANXU.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CG1.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CG1.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for ANXU.L.

CG1.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ANXU.L is Nasdaq-100. CG1.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR, while ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CG1.L and 0.13% for ANXU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CG1.L and ANXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer