CFWAX vs. RMLPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CFWAX (Calvert Global Water Fund) and RMLPX (Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CFWAX returned 4.81%/yr vs 24.50%/yr for RMLPX. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFWAX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for RMLPX.

Performance

CFWAX vs. RMLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) and Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFWAX achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly lower than RMLPX's 32.69% return.

CFWAX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 3.39%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: 10.11%
• 3Y*: 9.84%
• 5Y*: 4.81%
• 10Y*: 8.43%

RMLPX

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -2.08%
• YTD: 32.69%
• 6M: 29.61%
• 1Y: 41.17%
• 3Y*: 29.75%
• 5Y*: 24.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFWAX vs. RMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CFWAX Calvert Global Water Fund	3.39%	14.38%	3.91%	18.34%	-19.63%	22.59%	14.79%	28.02%	-14.05%
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund	32.69%	8.98%	30.03%	16.79%	35.03%	42.56%	-28.37%	15.33%	-15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CFWAX and RMLPX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2018	0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between CFWAX and RMLPX has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CFWAX vs. RMLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFWAX

CFWAX Risk / Return Rank: 9
CFWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CFWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
CFWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
CFWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
CFWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

RMLPX

RMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 78
RMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
RMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
RMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFWAX vs. RMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) and Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFWAX	RMLPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	2.65	-1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	3.46	-2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.44	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	5.59	-4.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.50	15.82	-13.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFWAX vs. RMLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFWAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the RMLPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFWAX and RMLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFWAX	RMLPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	2.65	-1.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	1.15	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.49	-0.09

Drawdowns

CFWAX vs. RMLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFWAX drawdown since its inception was -39.67%, smaller than the maximum RMLPX drawdown of -66.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFWAX and RMLPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFWAX	RMLPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.67%	-66.95%	+27.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.79%	-7.74%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.64%	-18.75%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.17%	-22.83%	-6.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.71%	-4.96%	-2.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.96%	-10.25%	+2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	2.73%	+1.52%

Volatility

CFWAX vs. RMLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) is 4.43%, while Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that CFWAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFWAX	RMLPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	6.83%	-2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.65%	13.18%	-2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.65%	16.31%	-2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.72%	21.43%	-5.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	28.05%	-11.11%

CFWAX vs. RMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFWAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than RMLPX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFWAX vs. RMLPX - Dividend Comparison

CFWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than RMLPX's 4.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFWAX Calvert Global Water Fund	4.62%	4.77%	9.25%	2.57%	1.47%	0.93%	0.77%	0.83%	1.30%	0.93%	0.00%	0.03%
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund	4.86%	6.38%	7.63%	6.49%	7.08%	8.89%	13.48%	7.25%	5.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFWAX and RMLPX in my portfolio?

CFWAX and RMLPX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFWAX or RMLPX?

RMLPX has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to CFWAX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFWAX dropped -39.67% vs RMLPX's -66.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.