PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFSTX vs. MDSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFSTX vs. MDSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commerce Short Term Government Fund (CFSTX) and Integrity Short Term Government Fund (MDSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFSTX achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than MDSIX's 1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CFSTX has underperformed MDSIX with an annualized return of 1.22%, while MDSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.98% annualized return.


CFSTX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
-0.25%
6M
-0.12%
1Y
2.69%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
1.22%

MDSIX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.68%
1Y
5.84%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
1.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFSTX vs. MDSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFSTX
Commerce Short Term Government Fund
-0.25%5.25%3.12%4.28%-6.59%-1.19%3.09%3.56%1.01%0.84%
MDSIX
Integrity Short Term Government Fund
1.65%6.91%6.90%4.30%-7.23%-1.14%2.76%3.54%2.21%1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CFSTX and MDSIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2011

0.64

The correlation between CFSTX and MDSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFSTX vs. MDSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFSTX
CFSTX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CFSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CFSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MDSIX
MDSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MDSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MDSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFSTX vs. MDSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Short Term Government Fund (CFSTX) and Integrity Short Term Government Fund (MDSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFSTXMDSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.52

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

4.81

-3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.75

19.50

-13.75

CFSTX vs. MDSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the MDSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFSTX and MDSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFSTXMDSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.47

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.65

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.63

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.61

+0.52

Drawdowns

CFSTX vs. MDSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFSTX drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum MDSIX drawdown of -11.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFSTX and MDSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFSTXMDSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-11.28%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

-1.22%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.72%

-2.60%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.02%

-11.08%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.02%

-11.28%

+2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.05%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-1.25%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

0.30%

+0.17%

Volatility

CFSTX vs. MDSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Commerce Short Term Government Fund (CFSTX) is 0.78%, while Integrity Short Term Government Fund (MDSIX) has a volatility of 1.07%. This indicates that CFSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFSTXMDSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

1.07%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.43%

1.81%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86%

2.38%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.35%

3.34%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.97%

3.16%

-1.19%

CFSTX vs. MDSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFSTX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than MDSIX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFSTX vs. MDSIX - Dividend Comparison

CFSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than MDSIX's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFSTX
Commerce Short Term Government Fund
2.56%2.26%1.62%2.05%1.30%1.53%1.99%2.44%1.94%1.61%1.69%1.40%
MDSIX
Integrity Short Term Government Fund
3.28%2.54%3.91%1.51%0.93%1.90%4.41%3.50%3.70%3.01%2.50%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFSTX and MDSIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDSIX has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to CFSTX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFSTX dropped -9.02% vs MDSIX's -11.28%.

MDSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFSTX and MDSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer