CFOU.TO vs. ZWK.TO
CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) and ZWK.TO (BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while ZWK.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BMO. CFOU.TO is passively managed, while ZWK.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CFOU.TO returned 29.38%/yr vs 5.81%/yr for ZWK.TO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFOU.TO charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ZWK.TO.
Performance
CFOU.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFOU.TO achieves a 27.75% return, which is significantly higher than ZWK.TO's 7.31% return.
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 12.30%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 35.24%
- 1Y
- 96.97%
- 3Y*
- 59.80%
- 5Y*
- 29.38%
- 10Y*
- 23.35%
ZWK.TO
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 34.94%
- 3Y*
- 26.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- —
CFOU.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 27.75% | 69.17% | 56.15% | 18.37% | -23.64% | 79.61% | -14.70% | 15.32% |
ZWK.TO BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF | 7.31% | 16.61% | 40.99% | -15.25% | -17.50% | 37.38% | -14.63% | 13.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFOU.TO and ZWK.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between CFOU.TO and ZWK.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
CFOU.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CFOU.TO
ZWK.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
CFOU.TO
ZWK.TO
Basic Materials
CFOU.TO
-
ZWK.TO
-
Communication Services
CFOU.TO
-
ZWK.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
CFOU.TO
-
ZWK.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
CFOU.TO
-
ZWK.TO
-
Energy
CFOU.TO
-
ZWK.TO
-
Healthcare
CFOU.TO
-
ZWK.TO
-
Industrials
CFOU.TO
-
ZWK.TO
-
Real Estate
CFOU.TO
-
ZWK.TO
-
Technology
CFOU.TO
-
ZWK.TO
-
Utilities
CFOU.TO
-
ZWK.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFOU.TO vs. ZWK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CFOU.TO
ZWK.TO
CFOU.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) and BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFOU.TO | ZWK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.33 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.06 | 2.23 | +3.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.79 | 7.13 | +17.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFOU.TO | ZWK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91 | 1.83 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 0.24 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.25 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
CFOU.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFOU.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.23%, which is greater than ZWK.TO's maximum drawdown of -48.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFOU.TO and ZWK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFOU.TO | ZWK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.23% | -48.02% | -38.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -15.73% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.95% | -25.84% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.23% | -48.02% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.62% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.46% | -16.46% | -6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 4.91% | -0.98% |
Volatility
CFOU.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) at 5.83%. This indicates that CFOU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZWK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFOU.TO | ZWK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | 5.83% | +2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.17% | 14.54% | +6.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.93% | 19.24% | +5.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 24.36% | +3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.86% | 28.55% | +5.31% |
CFOU.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFOU.TO has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ZWK.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFOU.TO vs. ZWK.TO - Dividend Comparison
CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZWK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZWK.TO BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF | 6.21% | 6.49% | 7.05% | 10.38% | 8.21% | 6.54% | 8.46% | 5.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFOU.TO and ZWK.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZWK.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZWK.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
CFOU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ZWK.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for CFOU.TO and 0.65% for ZWK.TO.
Find the right allocation for CFOU.TO and ZWK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer