CFOU.TO vs. HPYE.TO
CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) and HPYE.TO (Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index, while HPYE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. CFOU.TO is passively managed, while HPYE.TO is actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFOU.TO charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for HPYE.TO.
Performance
CFOU.TO vs. HPYE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 12.30%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 35.24%
- 1Y
- 96.97%
- 3Y*
- 59.80%
- 5Y*
- 29.38%
- 10Y*
- 23.35%
HPYE.TO
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 6.56%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CFOU.TO vs. HPYE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 27.49% |
HPYE.TO Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF | 10.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFOU.TO and HPYE.TO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFOU.TO vs. HPYE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CFOU.TO
HPYE.TO
CFOU.TO vs. HPYE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF (HPYE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFOU.TO | HPYE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.79 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFOU.TO | HPYE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 2.35 | -2.02 |
Drawdowns
CFOU.TO vs. HPYE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFOU.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.23%, which is greater than HPYE.TO's maximum drawdown of -5.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFOU.TO and HPYE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFOU.TO | HPYE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.23% | -5.51% | -80.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.46% | -1.37% | -21.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | — | — |
Volatility
CFOU.TO vs. HPYE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFOU.TO | HPYE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.93% | 12.93% | +12.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 12.93% | +14.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.86% | 12.93% | +20.93% |
CFOU.TO vs. HPYE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFOU.TO has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than HPYE.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFOU.TO vs. HPYE.TO - Dividend Comparison
CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HPYE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% |
HPYE.TO Harvest Premium Yield Enhanced ETF | 5.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFOU.TO and HPYE.TO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HPYE.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HPYE.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
CFOU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HPYE.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest Portfolios Group. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for CFOU.TO and 0.65% for HPYE.TO.
Find the right allocation for CFOU.TO and HPYE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer