CFNTX vs. CAUSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Green California Tax-Free Income Fund (CFNTX) and Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund (CAUSX).
CFNTX is managed by Shelton Capital Management. It was launched on Dec 3, 1985. CAUSX is managed by Shelton Capital Management. It was launched on Dec 3, 1985.
Performance
CFNTX vs. CAUSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFNTX vs. CAUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNTX Green California Tax-Free Income Fund | -0.84% | 2.54% | 1.13% | 7.39% | -6.28% | -0.04% | 3.22% | 5.39% | 0.96% | 3.35% |
CAUSX Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund | -0.25% | 6.38% | -0.20% | 3.83% | -7.74% | -2.99% | 5.33% | 4.98% | 0.48% | 0.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFNTX achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than CAUSX's -0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CFNTX has outperformed CAUSX with an annualized return of 1.44%, while CAUSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.77% annualized return.
CFNTX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 2.75%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.44%
CAUSX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 2.12%
- 3Y*
- 2.58%
- 5Y*
- 0.21%
- 10Y*
- 0.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFNTX vs. CAUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFNTX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than CAUSX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFNTX vs. CAUSX — Risk / Return Rank
CFNTX
CAUSX
CFNTX vs. CAUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Green California Tax-Free Income Fund (CFNTX) and Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund (CAUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFNTX | CAUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.69 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.96 | 1.05 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.12 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 1.15 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | 2.81 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFNTX | CAUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.69 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.04 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.19 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.74 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFNTX and CAUSX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CFNTX vs. CAUSX - Dividend Comparison
CFNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than CAUSX's 2.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNTX Green California Tax-Free Income Fund | 2.51% | 2.38% | 2.64% | 5.32% | 2.05% | 1.95% | 1.79% | 2.53% | 2.27% | 2.52% | 3.03% | 2.40% |
CAUSX Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund | 2.87% | 4.55% | 3.16% | 3.08% | 1.46% | 1.13% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.45% | 1.41% | 1.72% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
CFNTX vs. CAUSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFNTX drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, which is greater than CAUSX's maximum drawdown of -14.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFNTX and CAUSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFNTX | CAUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.08% | -14.35% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.16% | -3.85% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.99% | -12.17% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.99% | -14.35% | +4.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -2.75% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -3.20% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 1.58% | -0.32% |
Volatility
CFNTX vs. CAUSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Green California Tax-Free Income Fund (CFNTX) is 1.17%, while Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund (CAUSX) has a volatility of 1.88%. This indicates that CFNTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFNTX | CAUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 1.88% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.56% | 3.08% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 5.30% | -1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.20% | 4.91% | -1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.15% | 4.04% | -0.89% |