CFMSX vs. WAMFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CFMSX (Column Mid Cap Select Fund) and WAMFX (Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, CFMSX returned 15.89% vs 7.06% for WAMFX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CFMSX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for WAMFX.

Performance

CFMSX vs. WAMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Column Mid Cap Select Fund (CFMSX) and Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund (WAMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFMSX achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly higher than WAMFX's 2.40% return.

CFMSX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: 9.18%
• 6M: 7.62%
• 1Y: 15.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WAMFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 2.40%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 7.06%
• 3Y*: 9.45%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: 10.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFMSX vs. WAMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CFMSX Column Mid Cap Select Fund	9.18%	7.77%	-3.71%
WAMFX Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund	2.40%	4.82%	-4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CFMSX and WAMFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024	0.93

The correlation between CFMSX and WAMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CFMSX vs. WAMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFMSX

CFMSX Risk / Return Rank: 25
CFMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
CFMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CFMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
CFMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CFMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

WAMFX

WAMFX Risk / Return Rank: 10
WAMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
WAMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
WAMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
WAMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
WAMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFMSX vs. WAMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Column Mid Cap Select Fund (CFMSX) and Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund (WAMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CFMSX	WAMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	0.71	+0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	1.13	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.13	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	1.01	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.53	2.92	+3.62

CFMSX vs. WAMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the WAMFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFMSX and WAMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CFMSX vs. WAMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFMSX drawdown since its inception was -18.02%, smaller than the maximum WAMFX drawdown of -36.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFMSX and WAMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFMSX	WAMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.02%	-36.81%	+18.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	-8.38%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.82%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-2.17%	+1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.03%	-3.93%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	2.91%	-0.31%

Volatility

CFMSX vs. WAMFX - Volatility Comparison

Column Mid Cap Select Fund (CFMSX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund (WAMFX) at 3.26%. This indicates that CFMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFMSX	WAMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	3.26%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.52%	8.36%	+2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.00%	12.04%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.38%	15.81%	+1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.38%	17.49%	-0.11%

CFMSX vs. WAMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFMSX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than WAMFX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFMSX vs. WAMFX - Dividend Comparison

CFMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than WAMFX's 7.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFMSX Column Mid Cap Select Fund	1.94%	2.12%	0.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WAMFX Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund	7.06%	7.23%	3.49%	4.84%	5.55%	4.82%	3.87%	12.83%	7.08%	0.45%	5.06%	5.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFMSX and WAMFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CFMSX and WAMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CFMSX or WAMFX?

CFMSX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to WAMFX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFMSX dropped -18.02% vs WAMFX's -36.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.