CFLGX vs. SHRAX
Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund (CFLGX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX).
CFLGX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Oct 19, 1990. SHRAX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Oct 24, 1983.
Performance
CFLGX vs. SHRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFLGX vs. SHRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFLGX ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund | 0.40% | 4.21% | 19.62% | 19.36% | -10.34% | 25.71% | 0.32% | 30.94% | -6.04% | 6.69% |
SHRAX ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund | -7.17% | 13.50% | 12.02% | 24.09% | -25.43% | 7.35% | 19.74% | 24.26% | -7.93% | 14.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFLGX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly higher than SHRAX's -7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CFLGX has outperformed SHRAX with an annualized return of 9.33%, while SHRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.12% annualized return.
CFLGX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 7.18%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
SHRAX
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- -7.17%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 13.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 7.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFLGX vs. SHRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFLGX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SHRAX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFLGX vs. SHRAX — Risk / Return Rank
CFLGX
SHRAX
CFLGX vs. SHRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund (CFLGX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFLGX | SHRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 0.62 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 1.04 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 0.96 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | 3.02 | -0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFLGX | SHRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 0.62 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.09 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.34 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.45 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFLGX and SHRAX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CFLGX vs. SHRAX - Dividend Comparison
CFLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than SHRAX's 23.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFLGX ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund | 3.60% | 4.38% | 3.14% | 3.61% | 4.15% | 3.62% | 4.47% | 4.17% | 5.20% | 4.89% | 5.15% | 6.13% |
SHRAX ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund | 23.99% | 22.27% | 20.39% | 13.77% | 15.63% | 26.11% | 18.42% | 12.71% | 18.97% | 5.97% | 4.76% | 4.03% |
Drawdowns
CFLGX vs. SHRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFLGX drawdown since its inception was -61.49%, which is greater than SHRAX's maximum drawdown of -57.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFLGX and SHRAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFLGX | SHRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.49% | -57.26% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -14.59% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.39% | -33.77% | +15.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.07% | -33.77% | -8.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -11.69% | +5.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.56% | -11.29% | -4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 4.62% | -1.90% |
Volatility
CFLGX vs. SHRAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund (CFLGX) is 3.39%, while ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that CFLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFLGX | SHRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 7.07% | -3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 13.63% | -6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.64% | 23.09% | -8.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 20.84% | -6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 20.85% | -4.41% |