CFLGX vs. FKGRX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CFLGX (ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund) and FKGRX (Franklin Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - CFLGX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FKGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, CFLGX returned 9.79%/yr vs 14.05%/yr for FKGRX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CFLGX charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FKGRX.

Performance

CFLGX vs. FKGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund (CFLGX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFLGX achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than FKGRX's 6.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CFLGX has underperformed FKGRX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while FKGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.

CFLGX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 9.69%
• 6M: 8.53%
• 1Y: 18.97%
• 3Y*: 15.37%
• 5Y*: 9.77%
• 10Y*: 9.79%

FKGRX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 6M: 6.44%
• 1Y: 19.57%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 9.56%
• 10Y*: 14.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFLGX vs. FKGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFLGX ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund	9.69%	4.21%	19.62%	19.36%	-10.34%	25.71%	0.32%	30.94%	-6.04%	6.69%
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund	6.95%	15.38%	17.96%	27.54%	-25.32%	21.61%	30.71%	32.08%	-3.37%	26.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CFLGX and FKGRX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 1990	0.86

The correlation between CFLGX and FKGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CFLGX vs. FKGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFLGX

CFLGX Risk / Return Rank: 52
CFLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CFLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CFLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
CFLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CFLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FKGRX

FKGRX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FKGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FKGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FKGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FKGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FKGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFLGX vs. FKGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund (CFLGX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFLGX	FKGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	1.51	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.13	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.27	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	1.71	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.28	6.97	+4.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFLGX vs. FKGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the FKGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFLGX and FKGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFLGX	FKGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	1.51	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.49	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.72	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.71	-0.29

Drawdowns

CFLGX vs. FKGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFLGX drawdown since its inception was -61.49%, which is greater than FKGRX's maximum drawdown of -51.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFLGX and FKGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFLGX	FKGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.49%	-51.08%	-10.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.56%	-11.48%	+4.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.46%	-21.72%	+4.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.39%	-32.22%	+13.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.07%	-32.52%	-9.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.42%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.49%	-6.74%	-8.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	2.81%	-1.12%

Volatility

CFLGX vs. FKGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund (CFLGX) is 2.60%, while Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that CFLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFLGX	FKGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	3.23%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.25%	10.12%	-2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.73%	13.00%	-3.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.26%	19.59%	-5.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.45%	19.53%	-3.08%

CFLGX vs. FKGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFLGX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than FKGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFLGX vs. FKGRX - Dividend Comparison

CFLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than FKGRX's 13.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFLGX ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund	4.03%	4.38%	3.14%	3.61%	4.15%	3.62%	4.47%	4.17%	5.20%	4.89%	5.15%	6.13%
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund	13.44%	14.37%	8.34%	6.26%	10.49%	9.19%	7.97%	5.75%	1.65%	2.38%	3.26%	3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFLGX and FKGRX in my portfolio?

CFLGX and FKGRX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFLGX or FKGRX?

FKGRX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to CFLGX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFLGX dropped -61.49% vs FKGRX's -51.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.