PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFLGX vs. FALGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFLGX vs. FALGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund (CFLGX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, CFLGX has underperformed FALGX with an annualized return of 10.00%, while FALGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.87% annualized return.


CFLGX

1D
0.79%
1M
0.64%
YTD
9.12%
6M
8.20%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
10.00%

FALGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
7.64%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
13.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFLGX vs. FALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFLGX
ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund
9.12%4.21%19.62%19.36%-10.34%25.71%0.32%30.94%-6.04%6.69%
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
0.00%19.09%18.68%22.88%-8.40%25.20%8.27%31.01%-8.88%16.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CFLGX and FALGX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 1996

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between CFLGX and FALGX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFLGX vs. FALGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFLGX
CFLGX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CFLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CFLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FALGX
FALGX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFLGX vs. FALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund (CFLGX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CFLGXFALGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.02

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.57

3.23

+6.34

CFLGX vs. FALGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the FALGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFLGX and FALGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CFLGX vs. FALGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFLGX drawdown since its inception was -61.49%, roughly equal to the maximum FALGX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFLGX and FALGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFLGXFALGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.49%

-64.07%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.56%

-5.06%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-21.78%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.39%

-21.78%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-37.58%

-4.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-4.20%

+3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.46%

-14.41%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

2.96%

-1.26%

Volatility

CFLGX vs. FALGX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund (CFLGX) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that CFLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFLGXFALGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

0.00%

+3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.52%

3.31%

+4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

7.71%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.28%

16.60%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.45%

18.59%

-2.14%

CFLGX vs. FALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFLGX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than FALGX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFLGX vs. FALGX - Dividend Comparison

CFLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than FALGX's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFLGX
ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund
4.05%4.38%3.14%3.61%4.15%3.62%4.47%4.17%5.20%4.89%5.15%6.13%
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
5.76%5.76%0.00%3.20%1.91%6.44%5.25%8.39%16.99%6.42%1.85%2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFLGX and FALGX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFLGX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FALGX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFLGX dropped -61.49% vs FALGX's -64.07%.

CFLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFLGX and FALGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer