PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFJIX vs. GQHPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFJIX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFJIX achieves a 23.32% return, which is significantly higher than GQHPX's 13.55% return.


CFJIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.76%
6M
18.52%
YTD
23.32%
1Y
37.23%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
12.26%
ALL TIME*
12.45%

GQHPX

1D
-0.82%
1M
2.68%
6M
7.38%
YTD
13.55%
1Y
16.78%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CFJIX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CFJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund
23.32%16.76%14.63%9.86%-11.70%6.95%
GQHPX
GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund
13.55%7.53%12.69%3.94%6.73%10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CFJIX and GQHPX is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between CFJIX and GQHPX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFJIX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CFJIX
CFJIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CFJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CFJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GQHPX
GQHPX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GQHPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQHPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQHPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GQHPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQHPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CFJIX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CFJIXGQHPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.26

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

2.53

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.34

6.76

+8.58

CFJIX vs. GQHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFJIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the GQHPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFJIX and GQHPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CFJIX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFJIX drawdown since its inception was -36.91%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFJIX and GQHPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFJIXGQHPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.91%

-17.26%

-19.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-6.50%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

-8.71%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.62%

-17.26%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-1.02%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-3.34%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.43%

-0.19%

Volatility

CFJIX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX) is 3.46%, while GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that CFJIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFJIXGQHPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

4.32%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

9.14%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

11.03%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

12.74%

+3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.94%

12.74%

+5.20%

CFJIX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFJIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFJIX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison

CFJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, more than GQHPX's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CFJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund
7.43%9.16%6.31%2.07%2.02%4.17%1.88%2.17%4.87%6.79%2.28%
GQHPX
GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund
3.66%2.98%3.14%2.64%3.24%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFJIX and GQHPX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GQHPX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to CFJIX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFJIX dropped -36.91% vs GQHPX's -17.26%.

CFJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFJIX and GQHPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer