CFIPX vs. MCK
CFIPX (Franklin Global Equity Fund) is Global Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while MCK (McKesson Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CFIPX returned 14.31%/yr vs 16.82%/yr for MCK. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CFIPX vs. MCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFIPX achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly higher than MCK's -4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CFIPX has underperformed MCK with an annualized return of 14.31%, while MCK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.82% annualized return.
CFIPX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 26.06%
- 3Y*
- 22.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
MCK
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- -5.07%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- 24.85%
- 5Y*
- 33.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.82%
CFIPX vs. MCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund | 8.65% | 23.21% | 24.28% | 23.03% | -16.36% | 24.76% | 13.34% | 30.63% | -12.16% | 23.69% |
MCK McKesson Corporation | -4.75% | 44.54% | 23.67% | 24.13% | 51.82% | 44.23% | 27.06% | 26.72% | -28.40% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFIPX and MCK is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 1994 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CFIPX and MCK has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFIPX vs. MCK — Risk / Return Rank
CFIPX
MCK
CFIPX vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFIPX | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.08 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 0.28 | +2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.57 | 0.72 | +12.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFIPX vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFIPX drawdown since its inception was -62.70%, smaller than the maximum MCK drawdown of -82.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIPX and MCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFIPX | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.70% | -82.84% | +20.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -27.17% | +18.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.20% | -27.17% | +9.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.44% | -27.17% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.98% | -44.23% | +10.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -21.60% | +20.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.41% | -28.64% | +12.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 10.49% | -8.66% |
Volatility
CFIPX vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) is 4.50%, while McKesson Corporation (MCK) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that CFIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFIPX | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 6.43% | -1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 22.74% | -12.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 29.15% | -16.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 24.19% | -7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 28.83% | -11.55% |
Dividends
CFIPX vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison
CFIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than MCK's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund | 5.90% | 6.41% | 3.49% | 0.99% | 4.99% | 8.99% | 0.73% | 13.31% | 7.86% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.01% |
MCK McKesson Corporation | 0.42% | 0.37% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.54% | 0.72% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.32% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFIPX and MCK have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCK has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to CFIPX (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFIPX dropped -62.70% vs MCK's -82.84%.
CFIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFIPX and MCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer