CFIMX vs. AFNIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CFIMX (Clipper Fund) and AFNIX (AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFIMX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for AFNIX.

Performance

CFIMX vs. AFNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clipper Fund (CFIMX) and AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CFIMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.42%
• YTD: 9.25%
• 6M: 11.93%
• 1Y: 31.90%
• 3Y*: 24.75%
• 5Y*: 11.43%
• 10Y*: 12.98%

AFNIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFIMX vs. AFNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFIMX Clipper Fund	9.25%	27.39%	19.40%	31.59%	-18.80%	17.76%	9.96%	29.66%	-12.90%	17.69%
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I	1.74%	11.36%	16.23%	6.59%	-8.77%	25.23%	6.60%	25.71%	-1.98%	19.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CFIMX and AFNIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between CFIMX and AFNIX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CFIMX vs. AFNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFIMX

CFIMX Risk / Return Rank: 79
CFIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CFIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CFIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CFIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
CFIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFIMX vs. AFNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clipper Fund (CFIMX) and AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFIMX	AFNIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.96	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFIMX	AFNIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CFIMX	AFNIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CFIMX	AFNIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.50%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.56%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.50%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.86%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.61%	—	—

CFIMX vs. AFNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFIMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than AFNIX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFIMX vs. AFNIX - Dividend Comparison

CFIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, less than AFNIX's 31.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I	31.18%	14.13%	6.88%	3.43%	4.61%	1.78%	1.75%	2.13%	2.04%	1.72%	1.79%	2.66%
CFIMX Clipper Fund	7.60%	8.31%	13.43%	6.10%	5.67%	13.79%	2.45%	1.46%	10.12%	5.95%	10.43%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFIMX and AFNIX in my portfolio?

CFIMX and AFNIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.