PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFGRX vs. CHASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFGRX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFGRX achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 26.84% return. Over the past 10 years, CFGRX has underperformed CHASX with an annualized return of 16.48%, while CHASX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.37% annualized return.


CFGRX

1D
-0.31%
1M
6.81%
YTD
7.92%
6M
7.18%
1Y
21.56%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
16.48%

CHASX

1D
0.70%
1M
7.92%
YTD
26.84%
6M
27.99%
1Y
53.84%
3Y*
42.38%
5Y*
22.68%
10Y*
20.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFGRX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFGRX
Commerce Growth Fund
7.92%12.40%31.15%36.39%-26.57%26.50%28.96%35.60%-1.04%27.57%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
26.84%20.61%64.71%25.91%-20.41%22.32%18.27%42.63%-3.96%24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CFGRX and CHASX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 1997

0.90

The correlation between CFGRX and CHASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFGRX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFGRX
CFGRX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CFGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CFGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CHASX
CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFGRX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFGRXCHASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.54

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

5.63

-4.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

24.23

-18.32

CFGRX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFGRX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFGRXCHASXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

3.19

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

1.13

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

1.03

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.63

-0.17

Drawdowns

CFGRX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFGRX drawdown since its inception was -66.01%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFGRX and CHASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFGRXCHASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.01%

-45.94%

-20.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-9.90%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.60%

-23.40%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.51%

-24.63%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.59%

-30.40%

-1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

0.00%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.15%

-9.15%

-12.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

2.30%

+1.46%

Volatility

CFGRX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) is 3.00%, while Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that CFGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFGRXCHASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

5.51%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

13.68%

-3.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.36%

17.47%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

20.23%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

19.88%

-0.66%

CFGRX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFGRX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFGRX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

CFGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.19%, more than CHASX's 7.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFGRX
Commerce Growth Fund
18.19%19.63%10.50%4.53%7.17%21.20%4.09%5.91%10.50%5.74%6.05%11.93%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
7.19%9.12%36.67%5.80%5.49%20.15%7.83%22.82%12.92%11.92%9.14%10.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFGRX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHASX has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to CFGRX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFGRX dropped -66.01% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFGRX and CHASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer