CFBNX vs. QDVBX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CFBNX (Commerce Bond Fund) and QDVBX (Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, CFBNX returned 0.09%/yr vs -0.10%/yr for QDVBX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CFBNX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for QDVBX.

Performance

CFBNX vs. QDVBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commerce Bond Fund (CFBNX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFBNX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than QDVBX's -0.11% return.

CFBNX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: 0.09%
• 10Y*: 1.87%

QDVBX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 6M: -0.11%
• 1Y: 3.38%
• 3Y*: 4.28%
• 5Y*: -0.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFBNX vs. QDVBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CFBNX Commerce Bond Fund	0.24%	7.12%	1.52%	5.97%	-13.30%	-0.56%	7.15%	0.37%
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	-0.11%	7.64%	1.62%	6.37%	-14.31%	-0.37%	6.70%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CFBNX and QDVBX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2019	0.91

The correlation between CFBNX and QDVBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CFBNX vs. QDVBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFBNX

CFBNX Risk / Return Rank: 21
CFBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
CFBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CFBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
CFBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
CFBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

QDVBX

QDVBX Risk / Return Rank: 16
QDVBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
QDVBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
QDVBX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
QDVBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
QDVBX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFBNX vs. QDVBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Bond Fund (CFBNX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CFBNX	QDVBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	0.97	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	1.48	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.17	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	1.21	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	3.42	+0.68

CFBNX vs. QDVBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFBNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the QDVBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFBNX and QDVBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CFBNX vs. QDVBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFBNX drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, smaller than the maximum QDVBX drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFBNX and QDVBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFBNX	QDVBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.90%	-19.86%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.98%	-3.00%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.72%	-5.37%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.90%	-19.86%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-2.20%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-6.63%	+4.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	1.06%	+0.02%

Volatility

CFBNX vs. QDVBX - Volatility Comparison

Commerce Bond Fund (CFBNX) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) at 1.03%. This indicates that CFBNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFBNX	QDVBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	1.03%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.86%	2.63%	+0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.83%	3.74%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.57%	6.61%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.71%	6.21%	-1.50%

CFBNX vs. QDVBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFBNX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVBX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFBNX vs. QDVBX - Dividend Comparison

CFBNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than QDVBX's 3.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFBNX Commerce Bond Fund	3.62%	3.54%	2.94%	2.67%	2.40%	3.02%	2.71%	3.14%	3.25%	3.23%	3.40%	3.52%
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	3.51%	3.51%	3.52%	3.66%	2.56%	1.70%	3.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFBNX and QDVBX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, CFBNX and QDVBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CFBNX or QDVBX?

CFBNX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to QDVBX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFBNX dropped -17.90% vs QDVBX's -19.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFBNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.