CFAGX vs. WWNPX
CFAGX (Commerce MidCap Growth Fund) and WWNPX (Kinetics Paradigm Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CFAGX returned 10.57%/yr vs 18.03%/yr for WWNPX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFAGX charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for WWNPX.
Performance
CFAGX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFAGX achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than WWNPX's 14.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CFAGX has underperformed WWNPX with an annualized return of 10.57%, while WWNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.03% annualized return.
CFAGX
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- -0.43%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
WWNPX
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -10.16%
- YTD
- 14.36%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- -2.87%
- 3Y*
- 29.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
CFAGX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFAGX Commerce MidCap Growth Fund | 2.86% | 1.58% | 11.77% | 17.74% | -20.31% | 19.12% | 23.78% | 34.41% | -4.55% | 23.39% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 14.36% | -14.61% | 88.34% | -16.97% | 29.18% | 38.14% | 3.38% | 30.47% | -5.24% | 28.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFAGX and WWNPX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1999 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CFAGX and WWNPX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFAGX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank
CFAGX
WWNPX
CFAGX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce MidCap Growth Fund (CFAGX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFAGX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.02 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | -0.06 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.23 | -0.15 | +0.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFAGX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFAGX drawdown since its inception was -61.05%, smaller than the maximum WWNPX drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFAGX and WWNPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFAGX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.05% | -67.87% | +6.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.87% | -27.71% | +14.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -41.13% | +19.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.99% | -41.13% | +12.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.23% | -43.51% | +9.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -30.69% | +26.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.88% | -13.93% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 11.88% | -6.98% |
Volatility
CFAGX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Commerce MidCap Growth Fund (CFAGX) is 4.83%, while Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a volatility of 9.91%. This indicates that CFAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFAGX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 9.91% | -5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 26.89% | -15.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 33.71% | -19.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 33.01% | -14.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 28.70% | -10.23% |
CFAGX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFAGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFAGX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison
CFAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.20%, more than WWNPX's 7.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFAGX Commerce MidCap Growth Fund | 24.20% | 24.89% | 10.80% | 6.77% | 2.00% | 19.35% | 4.23% | 6.59% | 10.81% | 7.05% | 5.27% | 8.83% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 7.18% | 8.21% | 2.95% | 5.65% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.15% | 1.00% | 10.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFAGX and WWNPX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WWNPX has higher volatility (9.91%) compared to CFAGX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFAGX dropped -61.05% vs WWNPX's -67.87%.
CFAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFAGX and WWNPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer