PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFAGX vs. BARAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFAGX vs. BARAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commerce MidCap Growth Fund (CFAGX) and Baron Asset Fund (BARAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFAGX achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly higher than BARAX's -3.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CFAGX having a 10.48% annualized return and BARAX not far ahead at 10.51%.


CFAGX

1D
-0.50%
1M
2.64%
YTD
4.58%
6M
3.00%
1Y
2.52%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
10.48%

BARAX

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.74%
YTD
-3.88%
6M
1.00%
1Y
0.55%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFAGX vs. BARAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFAGX
Commerce MidCap Growth Fund
4.58%1.58%11.77%17.74%-20.31%19.12%23.78%34.41%-4.55%23.39%
BARAX
Baron Asset Fund
-3.88%7.89%10.35%17.05%-26.06%13.88%32.98%37.64%-0.15%26.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CFAGX and BARAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996

0.89

The correlation between CFAGX and BARAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFAGX vs. BARAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFAGX
CFAGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CFAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CFAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BARAX
BARAX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BARAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BARAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BARAX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BARAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BARAX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFAGX vs. BARAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce MidCap Growth Fund (CFAGX) and Baron Asset Fund (BARAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFAGXBARAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.03

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

0.11

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.67

0.23

+0.43

CFAGX vs. BARAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the BARAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFAGX and BARAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFAGXBARAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

0.08

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.10

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.53

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.49

-0.12

Drawdowns

CFAGX vs. BARAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFAGX drawdown since its inception was -61.05%, roughly equal to the maximum BARAX drawdown of -59.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFAGX and BARAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFAGXBARAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.05%

-59.71%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.87%

-10.75%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.16%

-17.82%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.99%

-37.53%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.23%

-37.53%

+3.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-5.36%

+3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.90%

-11.42%

-3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

5.20%

-0.36%

Volatility

CFAGX vs. BARAX - Volatility Comparison

Commerce MidCap Growth Fund (CFAGX) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to Baron Asset Fund (BARAX) at 3.28%. This indicates that CFAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BARAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFAGXBARAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.28%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

10.83%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.18%

14.75%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.40%

19.46%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

19.79%

-1.33%

CFAGX vs. BARAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFAGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than BARAX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFAGX vs. BARAX - Dividend Comparison

CFAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.80%, more than BARAX's 11.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BARAX
Baron Asset Fund
11.97%11.51%19.23%3.48%0.01%7.65%3.05%1.78%7.42%7.25%4.88%11.50%
CFAGX
Commerce MidCap Growth Fund
23.80%24.89%10.80%6.77%2.00%19.35%4.23%6.59%10.81%7.05%5.27%8.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFAGX and BARAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFAGX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to BARAX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFAGX dropped -61.05% vs BARAX's -59.71%.

CFAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFAGX and BARAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer