PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEW vs. GEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEW vs. GEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund (CEW) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CEW is traded in USD, while GEQT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GEQT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEW achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than GEQT.TO's 13.25% return.


CEW

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.70%
6M
3.84%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
6.87%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
2.54%

GEQT.TO

1D
-0.82%
1M
6.63%
YTD
13.25%
6M
13.24%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEW vs. GEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CEW
WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund
2.70%14.48%-0.99%9.06%-1.65%-6.62%6.40%
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio
13.25%23.50%15.51%25.14%-20.85%22.89%13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CEW and GEQT.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEW vs. GEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEW
CEW Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEW Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEW Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

GEQT.TO
GEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEW vs. GEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund (CEW) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEWGEQT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.92

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

2.63

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.58

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.57

11.29

-3.71

CEW vs. GEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEW and GEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEWGEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.92

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.68

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.92

-0.79

Drawdowns

CEW vs. GEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEW drawdown since its inception was -27.89%, smaller than the maximum GEQT.TO drawdown of -30.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEW and GEQT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEWGEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.89%

-30.28%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.85%

-10.87%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.28%

-17.90%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.02%

-30.28%

+15.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.82%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-6.64%

-6.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

2.49%

-1.35%

Volatility

CEW vs. GEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund (CEW) is 1.65%, while iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that CEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEWGEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

4.32%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.04%

12.27%

-7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.23%

14.68%

-8.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.85%

16.72%

-9.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.03%

16.43%

-9.40%

CEW vs. GEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEW has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GEQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEW vs. GEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

CEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than GEQT.TO's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CEW
WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund
2.41%2.47%5.42%2.00%0.80%0.00%0.64%1.90%1.87%
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio
1.10%1.25%1.38%1.58%1.82%1.32%0.87%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEW and GEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CEW.

CEW is categorized as Currency, while GEQT.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CEW and 0.25% for GEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEW and GEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer