CEW.TO vs. VDY.TO
CEW.TO (iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF) and VDY.TO (Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEW.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD, while VDY.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE Canada High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEW.TO returned 15.05%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for VDY.TO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEW.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VDY.TO.
Performance
CEW.TO vs. VDY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEW.TO achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly lower than VDY.TO's 20.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CEW.TO has outperformed VDY.TO with an annualized return of 15.05%, while VDY.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.02% annualized return.
CEW.TO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 15.99%
- 6M
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 44.58%
- 3Y*
- 29.74%
- 5Y*
- 17.56%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
VDY.TO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 20.59%
- 6M
- 22.32%
- 1Y
- 46.18%
- 3Y*
- 26.00%
- 5Y*
- 17.21%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
CEW.TO vs. VDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEW.TO iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF | 15.99% | 32.58% | 29.48% | 17.04% | -6.85% | 29.26% | -0.63% | 25.38% | -12.85% | 11.88% |
VDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 20.59% | 29.20% | 20.71% | 8.40% | -0.23% | 36.78% | -1.37% | 21.43% | -10.09% | 8.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEW.TO and VDY.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2012 | 0.83 |
The correlation between CEW.TO and VDY.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CEW.TO vs. VDY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CEW.TO
VDY.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
CEW.TO
VDY.TO
Basic Materials
CEW.TO
-
VDY.TO
Communication Services
CEW.TO
-
VDY.TO
Consumer Cyclical
CEW.TO
-
VDY.TO
Consumer Defensive
CEW.TO
-
VDY.TO
Energy
CEW.TO
-
VDY.TO
Healthcare
CEW.TO
-
VDY.TO
Industrials
CEW.TO
-
VDY.TO
Real Estate
CEW.TO
-
VDY.TO
-
Technology
CEW.TO
-
VDY.TO
Utilities
CEW.TO
-
VDY.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEW.TO vs. VDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CEW.TO
VDY.TO
CEW.TO vs. VDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF (CEW.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEW.TO | VDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 2.14 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 14.88 | -8.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.14 | 60.75 | -37.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEW.TO | VDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86 | 5.65 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.31 | 1.50 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.88 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.84 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
CEW.TO vs. VDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEW.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.58%, which is greater than VDY.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEW.TO and VDY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEW.TO | VDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.58% | -39.21% | -14.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -3.12% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.74% | -10.87% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.46% | -16.18% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.66% | -39.21% | -4.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -0.77% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -4.61% | -2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 0.76% | +1.17% |
Volatility
CEW.TO vs. VDY.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF (CEW.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO) at 3.31%. This indicates that CEW.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEW.TO | VDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 3.31% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 6.87% | +3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 8.21% | +3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 11.56% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 15.96% | +1.04% |
CEW.TO vs. VDY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEW.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VDY.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEW.TO vs. VDY.TO - Dividend Comparison
CEW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than VDY.TO's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEW.TO iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF | 2.42% | 2.75% | 3.32% | 3.87% | 3.84% | 2.93% | 3.61% | 3.20% | 2.95% | 2.47% | 2.54% | 2.74% |
VDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 2.90% | 3.59% | 4.40% | 4.64% | 4.42% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.25% | 4.43% | 3.82% | 3.25% | 4.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEW.TO and VDY.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDY.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDY.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for CEW.TO.
CEW.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while VDY.TO is Dividend. CEW.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD, while VDY.TO tracks FTSE Canada High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for CEW.TO and 0.22% for VDY.TO.
Find the right allocation for CEW.TO and VDY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer