CEW.TO vs. HBNK.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CEW.TO (iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF) and HBNK.TO (Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - CEW.TO tracks the Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD while HBNK.TO tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CEW.TO returned 44.58% vs 60.09% for HBNK.TO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEW.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for HBNK.TO.

Performance

CEW.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF (CEW.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEW.TO achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly lower than HBNK.TO's 18.85% return.

CEW.TO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 4.69%
• YTD: 15.99%
• 6M: 18.59%
• 1Y: 44.58%
• 3Y*: 29.74%
• 5Y*: 17.56%
• 10Y*: 15.05%

HBNK.TO

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 5.21%
• YTD: 18.85%
• 6M: 24.41%
• 1Y: 60.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEW.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CEW.TO iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF	15.99%	32.58%	29.48%	9.43%
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	18.85%	43.71%	24.77%	8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CEW.TO and HBNK.TO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2023	0.87

The correlation between CEW.TO and HBNK.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CEW.TO vs. HBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEW.TO

CEW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CEW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CEW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CEW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CEW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CEW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

HBNK.TO

HBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
HBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEW.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF (CEW.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CEW.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.86	4.77	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.25	6.50	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.88	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.29	7.13	-0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.14	30.99	-7.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CEW.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.86, which is comparable to the HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEW.TO and HBNK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CEW.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.86	4.77	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	2.66	-2.07

Drawdowns

CEW.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEW.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.58%, which is greater than HBNK.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEW.TO and HBNK.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEW.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.58%	-14.78%	-38.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-8.48%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.50%	-2.30%	+0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-2.33%	-4.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	1.95%	-0.02%

Volatility

CEW.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF (CEW.TO) is 3.65%, while Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that CEW.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEW.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	5.00%	-1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.12%	11.26%	-1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.61%	12.67%	-1.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.49%	12.70%	+0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	12.70%	+4.30%

CEW.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEW.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than HBNK.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEW.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

CEW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than HBNK.TO's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEW.TO iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF	2.42%	2.75%	3.32%	3.87%	3.84%	2.93%	3.61%	3.20%	2.95%	2.47%	2.54%	2.74%
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	2.82%	3.24%	4.15%	2.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEW.TO and HBNK.TO in my portfolio?

CEW.TO and HBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CEW.TO or HBNK.TO?

On fees, HBNK.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEW.TO or HBNK.TO?

HBNK.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for CEW.TO.

What is the main difference between CEW.TO and HBNK.TO?

CEW.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD, while HBNK.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for CEW.TO and 0.09% for HBNK.TO.