PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEUR.L vs. IEVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEUR.L vs. IEVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CEUR.L is traded in GBp, while IEVL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEVL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEUR.L achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than IEVL.L's 13.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CEUR.L has underperformed IEVL.L with an annualized return of 9.88%, while IEVL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.


CEUR.L

1D
0.46%
1M
3.94%
YTD
6.66%
6M
8.98%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.88%

IEVL.L

1D
0.17%
1M
4.83%
YTD
13.11%
6M
15.93%
1Y
36.39%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEUR.L vs. IEVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
6.66%24.46%4.90%12.93%-5.96%17.02%2.29%19.59%-9.49%14.99%
IEVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating
13.11%42.23%5.56%11.28%1.19%19.17%-3.59%14.85%-12.63%15.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CEUR.L and IEVL.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2015

0.87

The correlation between CEUR.L and IEVL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

CEUR.L vs. IEVL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CEUR.L
IEVL.L

Financial Services

25.1%
22.6%

Industrials

19.8%
17.0%

Healthcare

13.8%
12.3%

Technology

10.4%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
6.2%

Utilities

5.3%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.8%
6.2%

Energy

3.5%
5.1%

Communication Services

3.4%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.6%

Financial Services

CEUR.L
25.1%
IEVL.L
22.6%

Industrials

CEUR.L
19.8%
IEVL.L
17.0%

Healthcare

CEUR.L
13.8%
IEVL.L
12.3%

Technology

CEUR.L
10.4%
IEVL.L
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

CEUR.L
7.2%
IEVL.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CEUR.L
6.2%
IEVL.L
6.2%

Utilities

CEUR.L
5.3%
IEVL.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

CEUR.L
3.8%
IEVL.L
6.2%

Energy

CEUR.L
3.5%
IEVL.L
5.1%

Communication Services

CEUR.L
3.4%
IEVL.L
3.7%

Real Estate

CEUR.L
1.7%
IEVL.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEUR.L vs. IEVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEUR.L
CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IEVL.L
IEVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEUR.L vs. IEVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEUR.LIEVL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.48

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

3.42

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.06

12.70

-6.65

CEUR.L vs. IEVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEUR.L and IEVL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEUR.LIEVL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.68

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.96

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.69

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.58

-0.02

Drawdowns

CEUR.L vs. IEVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEUR.L drawdown since its inception was -28.63%, smaller than the maximum IEVL.L drawdown of -34.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEUR.L and IEVL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEUR.LIEVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.63%

-34.82%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-10.59%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.66%

-16.33%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.85%

-16.48%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.63%

-34.82%

+6.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-0.82%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-6.05%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.86%

+0.31%

Volatility

CEUR.L vs. IEVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) is 4.25%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that CEUR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEUR.LIEVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

4.85%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

11.06%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

13.52%

-1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

15.24%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

17.13%

-2.16%

CEUR.L vs. IEVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEUR.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IEVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEUR.L vs. IEVL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEUR.L nor IEVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CEUR.L and IEVL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEVL.L.

CEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IEVL.L tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for CEUR.L and 0.25% for IEVL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEUR.L and IEVL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer