PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CEUG.L vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CEUG.L vs. IUIT.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CEUG.L (iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEUG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IUIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEUG.L returned 12.03%/yr vs 26.05%/yr for IUIT.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEUG.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIT.L.

Performance

CEUG.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CEUG.L is traded in GBP, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEUG.L achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 26.17% return.

CEUG.L

1D
0.43%
1M
4.93%
YTD
9.89%
6M
11.74%
1Y
20.38%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
—

IUIT.L

1D
0.00%
1M
16.60%
YTD
26.17%
6M
24.49%
1Y
56.60%
3Y*
31.96%
5Y*
26.05%
10Y*
27.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEUG.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CEUG.L
iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)		9.89%26.75%10.82%20.52%-10.51%22.89%-0.23%26.22%-13.84%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF		23.54%14.17%40.92%51.48%-20.73%35.36%38.94%43.23%-8.84%

Correlation

The correlation between CEUG.L and IUIT.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018

0.56

The correlation between CEUG.L and IUIT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CEUG.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CEUG.L
IUIT.L

Financial Services

24.2%

-

Industrials

21.4%
0.0%

Technology

14.6%
99.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%

-

Utilities

6.8%

-

Healthcare

5.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Energy

4.2%
0.1%

Basic Materials

4.1%

-

Communication Services

4.1%

-

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Financial Services

CEUG.L
24.2%
IUIT.L

-

Industrials

CEUG.L
21.4%
IUIT.L
0.0%

Technology

CEUG.L
14.6%
IUIT.L
99.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CEUG.L
8.3%
IUIT.L

-

Utilities

CEUG.L
6.8%
IUIT.L

-

Healthcare

CEUG.L
5.8%
IUIT.L

-

Consumer Defensive

CEUG.L
5.6%
IUIT.L

-

Energy

CEUG.L
4.2%
IUIT.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

CEUG.L
4.1%
IUIT.L

-

Communication Services

CEUG.L
4.1%
IUIT.L

-

Real Estate

CEUG.L
1.0%
IUIT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)

iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF

Often compared with CEUG.L:
CEUG.L vs. VERX.LCEUG.L vs. VEVE.LCEUG.L vs. FRIN.LCEUG.L vs. CSP1.LCEUG.L vs. FLXD.LCEUG.L vs. CEUR.LCEUG.L vs. GLD
Often compared with IUIT.L:
IUIT.L vs. VGTIUIT.L vs. QQQIUIT.L vs. QQQMIUIT.L vs. EQQQ.DEIUIT.L vs. VOOIUIT.L vs. VUAA.LIUIT.L vs. WITS.AS

Return for Risk

CEUG.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CEUG.L
CEUG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CEUG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEUG.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CEUG.LIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.44
2.78

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.14
3.57

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.46

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.32

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.54

8.42

-0.88

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CEUG.L vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEUG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEUG.L and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CEUG.LIUIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.78

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

1.14

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.26

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.24

-0.66

Drawdowns

CEUG.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEUG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.52%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEUG.L and IUIT.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CEUG.LIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.52%

-28.01%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-16.96%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

-28.01%

+12.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-28.01%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-28.01%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.78%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-5.29%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

6.70%

-4.00%

Volatility

CEUG.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.L) is 5.01%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that CEUG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CEUG.LIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

7.16%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

15.20%

-3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

20.23%

-6.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

22.82%

-6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

22.51%

-4.47%

CEUG.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEUG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CEUG.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

CEUG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, while IUIT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CEUG.L
iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)		2.35%2.53%2.80%2.73%2.84%1.81%1.77%3.05%0.38%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

CEUG.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEUG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUIT.L.

CEUG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. CEUG.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEUG.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEUG.L and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer