CEU2.L vs. PRUK.L
CEU2.L (Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR) and PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - CEU2.L tracks the MSCI Europe Index while PRUK.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEU2.L returned 8.70%/yr vs -0.60%/yr for PRUK.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEU2.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRUK.L.
Performance
CEU2.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CEU2.L is traded in USD, while PRUK.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRUK.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEU2.L achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 1.11% return.
CEU2.L
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- 16.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- —
PRUK.L
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 4.53%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- —
CEU2.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEU2.L Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR | 5.49% | 34.96% | 2.14% | 19.74% | -14.16% | 16.28% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 1.11% | 22.14% | 4.08% | 13.03% | -31.01% | 12.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEU2.L and PRUK.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between CEU2.L and PRUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
CEU2.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
Industrials
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
Healthcare
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
Technology
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Defensive
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
Energy
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
Basic Materials
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
Utilities
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
Communication Services
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
Real Estate
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEU2.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
CEU2.L
PRUK.L
CEU2.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR (CEU2.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEU2.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.09 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 0.47 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 1.57 | +3.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEU2.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 0.43 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | -0.03 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.35 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
CEU2.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEU2.L drawdown since its inception was -30.85%, smaller than the maximum PRUK.L drawdown of -48.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEU2.L and PRUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEU2.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.85% | -48.73% | +17.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -15.53% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.49% | -21.14% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | -48.73% | +17.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -6.55% | +3.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -18.63% | +12.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 4.64% | -1.41% |
Volatility
CEU2.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR (CEU2.L) is 4.64%, while Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that CEU2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEU2.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 5.11% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.89% | 13.45% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 16.77% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 20.44% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 20.43% | -3.22% |
CEU2.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEU2.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEU2.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison
CEU2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEU2.L Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.63% | 3.70% | 3.63% | 3.43% | 3.50% | 1.73% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEU2.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for CEU2.L.
CEU2.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEU2.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.
Find the right allocation for CEU2.L and PRUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer