PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CEU1.L vs. PRUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CEU1.L vs. PRUK.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CEU1.L (iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Europe Equities funds - CEU1.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while PRUK.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEU1.L returned 10.72%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PRUK.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEU1.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRUK.L.

Performance

CEU1.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEU1.L achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 2.88% return.

CEU1.L

1D
0.41%
1M
4.87%
YTD
7.95%
6M
9.61%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.08%

PRUK.L

1D
1.00%
1M
3.43%
YTD
2.88%
6M
5.16%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEU1.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CEU1.L
iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		7.95%30.63%4.62%16.50%-6.40%14.38%9.72%
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)		2.88%13.57%5.85%7.37%-22.76%12.69%22.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CEU1.L and PRUK.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.69

The correlation between CEU1.L and PRUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

CEU1.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CEU1.L
PRUK.L

Financial Services

24.0%
19.9%

Industrials

21.0%
22.2%

Technology

15.9%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
13.2%

Utilities

6.4%
3.4%

Healthcare

5.6%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
6.4%

Communication Services

4.3%
6.8%

Basic Materials

4.0%
7.3%

Energy

3.9%
2.9%

Real Estate

0.9%
8.0%

Financial Services

CEU1.L
24.0%
PRUK.L
19.9%

Industrials

CEU1.L
21.0%
PRUK.L
22.2%

Technology

CEU1.L
15.9%
PRUK.L
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CEU1.L
8.4%
PRUK.L
13.2%

Utilities

CEU1.L
6.4%
PRUK.L
3.4%

Healthcare

CEU1.L
5.6%
PRUK.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

CEU1.L
5.6%
PRUK.L
6.4%

Communication Services

CEU1.L
4.3%
PRUK.L
6.8%

Basic Materials

CEU1.L
4.0%
PRUK.L
7.3%

Energy

CEU1.L
3.9%
PRUK.L
2.9%

Real Estate

CEU1.L
0.9%
PRUK.L
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)

Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)

Often compared with CEU1.L:
CEU1.L vs. WLDL.LCEU1.L vs. CS51.LCEU1.L vs. EIMI.LCEU1.L vs. VUKG.LCEU1.L vs. IEFV.LCEU1.L vs. SCHDCEU1.L vs. EEM
Often compared with PRUK.L:
PRUK.L vs. EDIV.LPRUK.L vs. MVED.LPRUK.L vs. VUKE.DEPRUK.L vs. IWQU.LPRUK.L vs. MIVO.LPRUK.L vs. FEUZ.LPRUK.L vs. CS1.L

Return for Risk

CEU1.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CEU1.L
CEU1.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CEU1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
PRUK.L
PRUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEU1.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CEU1.LPRUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.51
0.70

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.20
1.09

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.13

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

0.76

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

2.52

+4.27

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CEU1.L vs. PRUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEU1.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEU1.L and PRUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CEU1.LPRUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

0.70

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.05

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.38

+0.13

Drawdowns

CEU1.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEU1.L drawdown since its inception was -31.47%, smaller than the maximum PRUK.L drawdown of -36.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEU1.L and PRUK.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CEU1.LPRUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.47%

-36.10%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-13.05%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-18.00%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.68%

-36.10%

+14.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.39%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-3.76%

+3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-14.80%

+9.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

3.93%

-0.83%

Volatility

CEU1.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) is 4.55%, while Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that CEU1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CEU1.LPRUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

4.82%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

11.72%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.89%

14.14%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

16.54%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

17.45%

-0.68%

CEU1.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEU1.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CEU1.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison

CEU1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CEU1.L
iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)		3.60%3.70%3.63%3.43%3.50%1.73%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

CEU1.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for CEU1.L.

CEU1.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEU1.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEU1.L and PRUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer