PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CETH.DE vs. CLTC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CETH.DE vs. CLTC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) and CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CETH.DE having a -39.33% return and CLTC.DE slightly higher at -38.45%.


CETH.DE

1D
-3.68%
1M
-24.82%
YTD
-39.33%
6M
-43.83%
1Y
-33.29%
3Y*
-3.03%
5Y*
10Y*

CLTC.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
-13.93%
YTD
-38.45%
6M
-43.65%
1Y
-48.83%
3Y*
-23.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CETH.DE vs. CLTC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CETH.DE
CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)
-39.33%-21.13%53.89%91.46%-66.40%43.27%
CLTC.DE
CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR
-38.45%-33.53%39.59%9.00%-53.04%-10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CETH.DE and CLTC.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2021

0.75

The correlation between CETH.DE and CLTC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CETH.DE vs. CLTC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CETH.DE
CETH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CETH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

CLTC.DE
CLTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CLTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CETH.DE vs. CLTC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) and CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CETH.DECLTC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.87

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

-0.77

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

-1.24

+0.32

CETH.DE vs. CLTC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CETH.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is higher than the CLTC.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CETH.DE and CLTC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CETH.DECLTC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

-0.80

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

-0.31

+0.20

Drawdowns

CETH.DE vs. CLTC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CETH.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum CLTC.DE drawdown of -84.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CETH.DE and CLTC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CETH.DECLTC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.74%

-84.88%

+8.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.38%

-63.63%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.55%

-70.69%

+6.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.93%

-84.86%

+21.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.92%

-65.45%

+22.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.18%

39.63%

-3.45%

Volatility

CETH.DE vs. CLTC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) is 10.13%, while CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) has a volatility of 11.65%. This indicates that CETH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLTC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CETH.DECLTC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.13%

11.65%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.06%

35.99%

+6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.59%

60.87%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.66%

75.60%

-7.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.66%

75.60%

-7.94%

CETH.DE vs. CLTC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CETH.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CLTC.DE's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CETH.DE vs. CLTC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CETH.DE nor CLTC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CETH.DE and CLTC.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CETH.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CETH.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CLTC.DE.

Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CETH.DE and 1.50% for CLTC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CETH.DE and CLTC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer