CESG.L vs. CIBR.L
CESG.L (First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc) and CIBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - CESG.L is a ESG fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. CESG.L is actively managed, while CIBR.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CESG.L returned 5.33%/yr vs 13.75%/yr for CIBR.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CESG.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.L.
Performance
CESG.L vs. CIBR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CESG.L achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR.L's 29.65% return.
CESG.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR.L
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- 8.41%
- 6M
- 30.61%
- YTD
- 29.65%
- 1Y
- 26.20%
- 3Y*
- 25.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.75%
- 10Y*
- —
CESG.L vs. CIBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CESG.L First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc | 2.70% | 11.47% | 9.71% | 12.32% | -13.97% | 23.33% |
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 29.65% | 7.59% | 18.94% | 40.85% | -27.53% | 29.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between CESG.L and CIBR.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CESG.L and CIBR.L has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CESG.L vs. CIBR.L — Risk / Return Rank
CESG.L
CIBR.L
CESG.L vs. CIBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc (CESG.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CESG.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 1.12 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | 2.56 | -1.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CESG.L vs. CIBR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CESG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.69%, smaller than the maximum CIBR.L drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CESG.L and CIBR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CESG.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.69% | -33.69% | +11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -23.23% | +14.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.31% | -23.42% | +13.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.69% | -33.69% | +11.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -1.96% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -10.36% | +4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 10.22% | -6.81% |
Volatility
CESG.L vs. CIBR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Global Capital Strength ESG Leaders UCITS ETF Class A USD Acc (CESG.L) is 3.44%, while First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) has a volatility of 8.39%. This indicates that CESG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CESG.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 8.39% | -4.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 23.52% | -15.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 26.47% | -16.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 24.52% | -11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.53% | 24.09% | -11.56% |
CESG.L vs. CIBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CESG.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CESG.L vs. CIBR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CESG.L nor CIBR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CESG.L and CIBR.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIBR.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIBR.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CESG.L.
CESG.L is categorized as ESG, while CIBR.L is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CESG.L and 0.60% for CIBR.L.
Find the right allocation for CESG.L and CIBR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer