PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CES1.L vs. EEI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CES1.L vs. EEI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L) and WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CES1.L achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than EEI.L's 10.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CES1.L has outperformed EEI.L with an annualized return of 10.11%, while EEI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.18% annualized return.


CES1.L

1D
0.11%
1M
2.95%
YTD
10.08%
6M
12.64%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*
10.11%

EEI.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.61%
YTD
10.61%
6M
13.56%
1Y
22.61%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
4.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CES1.L vs. EEI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CES1.L
iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)
10.08%30.70%-4.07%11.92%-11.62%15.21%11.44%21.04%-16.15%28.53%
EEI.L
WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF
10.61%26.84%-7.65%5.93%0.84%5.79%-16.98%9.05%-10.50%9.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CES1.L and EEI.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2014

0.80

The correlation between CES1.L and EEI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CES1.L vs. EEI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CES1.L
EEI.L

Industrials

28.9%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
3.3%

Technology

10.6%
1.5%

Basic Materials

10.4%
8.3%

Financial Services

9.5%
24.7%

Real Estate

7.2%
4.8%

Energy

5.9%
11.6%

Healthcare

4.5%
2.8%

Communication Services

4.0%
8.6%

Utilities

3.7%
16.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
2.3%

Industrials

CES1.L
28.9%
EEI.L
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CES1.L
13.1%
EEI.L
3.3%

Technology

CES1.L
10.6%
EEI.L
1.5%

Basic Materials

CES1.L
10.4%
EEI.L
8.3%

Financial Services

CES1.L
9.5%
EEI.L
24.7%

Real Estate

CES1.L
7.2%
EEI.L
4.8%

Energy

CES1.L
5.9%
EEI.L
11.6%

Healthcare

CES1.L
4.5%
EEI.L
2.8%

Communication Services

CES1.L
4.0%
EEI.L
8.6%

Utilities

CES1.L
3.7%
EEI.L
16.7%

Consumer Defensive

CES1.L
2.4%
EEI.L
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CES1.L vs. EEI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CES1.L
CES1.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CES1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CES1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CES1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CES1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CES1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

EEI.L
EEI.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EEI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EEI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CES1.L vs. EEI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L) and WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CES1.LEEI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

2.71

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

10.53

-3.98

CES1.L vs. EEI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CES1.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the EEI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CES1.L and EEI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CES1.LEEI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.07

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.46

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.27

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.21

+0.45

Drawdowns

CES1.L vs. EEI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CES1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum EEI.L drawdown of -37.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CES1.L and EEI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CES1.LEEI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-37.68%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-8.29%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.92%

-14.75%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.02%

-17.71%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

-37.68%

+5.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-0.98%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-11.38%

+5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.14%

+0.97%

Volatility

CES1.L vs. EEI.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF (EEI.L) at 3.45%. This indicates that CES1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CES1.LEEI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

3.45%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

8.55%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.43%

10.89%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

13.75%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

15.52%

+0.49%

CES1.L vs. EEI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CES1.L has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than EEI.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CES1.L vs. EEI.L - Dividend Comparison

CES1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CES1.L
iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEI.L
WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF
0.05%0.05%0.07%0.06%0.05%0.05%0.06%0.06%0.05%0.04%0.03%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


CES1.L and EEI.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EEI.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEI.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for CES1.L.

CES1.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR, while EEI.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CES1.L and 0.29% for EEI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CES1.L and EEI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer