CERS vs. IFC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Cerus Corporation (CERS) and Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO).
Performance
CERS vs. IFC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CERS vs. IFC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CERS Cerus Corporation | -9.22% | 33.77% | -28.70% | -40.82% | -46.40% | -1.59% | 63.98% | -16.77% | 50.00% | -22.30% |
IFC.TO Intact Financial Corporation | -15.02% | 16.55% | 20.65% | 9.39% | 12.96% | 12.20% | 12.21% | 52.36% | -10.38% | 19.88% |
Different Trading Currencies
CERS is traded in USD, while IFC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the IFC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
CERS:
$356.41M
IFC.TO:
CA$43.48B
CERS:
-$0.08
IFC.TO:
CA$18.86
CERS:
1.73
IFC.TO:
1.67
CERS:
5.49
IFC.TO:
2.28
CERS:
$206.13M
IFC.TO:
CA$26.07B
CERS:
$112.29M
IFC.TO:
CA$5.70B
CERS:
-$7.56M
IFC.TO:
CA$5.33B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CERS achieves a -9.22% return, which is significantly higher than IFC.TO's -12.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CERS has underperformed IFC.TO with an annualized return of -11.00%, while IFC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return.
CERS
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -26.09%
- YTD
- -9.22%
- 6M
- 23.03%
- 1Y
- 35.51%
- 3Y*
- -14.29%
- 5Y*
- -21.01%
- 10Y*
- -11.00%
IFC.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- -12.41%
- 6M
- -4.33%
- 1Y
- -11.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CERS vs. IFC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CERS
IFC.TO
CERS vs. IFC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cerus Corporation (CERS) and Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CERS | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | -0.55 | +1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | -0.65 | +1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.92 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | -0.42 | +1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.40 | -0.72 | +3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CERS | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | -0.55 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.53 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 | 0.61 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.71 | -0.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between CERS and IFC.TO is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CERS vs. IFC.TO - Dividend Comparison
CERS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IFC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CERS Cerus Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IFC.TO Intact Financial Corporation | 2.24% | 1.86% | 1.85% | 2.16% | 2.05% | 2.07% | 2.20% | 2.16% | 2.82% | 2.44% | 2.41% | 2.39% |
Drawdowns
CERS vs. IFC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CERS drawdown since its inception was -99.28%, which is greater than IFC.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERS and IFC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CERS | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.28% | -53.53% | -45.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.32% | -21.67% | -16.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.37% | -21.67% | -63.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.45% | -30.57% | -55.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.68% | -21.67% | -76.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -8.84% | -72.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.40% | 12.20% | +2.20% |
Volatility
CERS vs. IFC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Cerus Corporation (CERS) has a higher volatility of 20.35% compared to Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO) at 5.84%. This indicates that CERS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CERS | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.35% | 5.84% | +14.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.22% | 14.28% | +38.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.32% | 21.07% | +50.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.65% | 19.01% | +48.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.07% | 20.59% | +41.48% |
Financials
CERS vs. IFC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cerus Corporation and Intact Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CERS vs. IFC.TO - Profitability Comparison
CERS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cerus Corporation reported a gross profit of 29.75M and revenue of 57.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.5%.
IFC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Intact Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.63B and revenue of 6.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.
CERS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cerus Corporation reported an operating income of -641.00K and revenue of 57.75M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.1%.
IFC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Intact Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.21B and revenue of 6.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
CERS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cerus Corporation reported a net income of -2.18M and revenue of 57.75M, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.
IFC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Intact Financial Corporation reported a net income of 961.00M and revenue of 6.64B, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.