CEQT.TO vs. SOLX.TO
CEQT.TO (CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF) and SOLX.TO (CI Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEQT.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by CI, while SOLX.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by CI. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEQT.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SOLX.TO.
Performance
CEQT.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEQT.TO achieves a 13.14% return, which is significantly higher than SOLX.TO's -39.87% return.
CEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 6.45%
- YTD
- 13.14%
- 6M
- 13.90%
- 1Y
- 32.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLX.TO
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -9.51%
- YTD
- -39.87%
- 6M
- -49.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEQT.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 13.14% | 7.87% |
SOLX.TO CI Galaxy Solana ETF | -39.87% | -40.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEQT.TO and SOLX.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEQT.TO vs. SOLX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CEQT.TO
SOLX.TO
CEQT.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) and CI Galaxy Solana ETF (SOLX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEQT.TO | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.03 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.96 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEQT.TO | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.67 | -1.02 | +2.69 |
Drawdowns
CEQT.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, smaller than the maximum SOLX.TO drawdown of -70.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEQT.TO and SOLX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEQT.TO | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.02% | -70.44% | +56.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -70.44% | +70.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -47.74% | +46.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | — | — |
Volatility
CEQT.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEQT.TO | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | 73.25% | -62.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 73.25% | -60.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 73.25% | -60.14% |
CEQT.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEQT.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SOLX.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEQT.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Dividend Comparison
CEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while SOLX.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 0.90% | 1.25% | 1.82% | 1.06% |
SOLX.TO CI Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.81% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEQT.TO and SOLX.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLX.TO.
CEQT.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SOLX.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CEQT.TO and 1.00% for SOLX.TO.
Find the right allocation for CEQT.TO and SOLX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer