CEQT.TO vs. CBCX.TO
CEQT.TO (CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF) and CBCX.TO (CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD) are both exchange-traded funds - CEQT.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by CI, while CBCX.TO is a Blockchain fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Technology NTR Hedged (CAD). CEQT.TO is actively managed, while CBCX.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CEQT.TO returned 22.17%/yr vs 59.59%/yr for CBCX.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CEQT.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEQT.TO achieves a 13.14% return, which is significantly lower than CBCX.TO's 18.36% return.
CEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 13.14%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 32.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBCX.TO
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 13.36%
- YTD
- 18.36%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 58.88%
- 3Y*
- 59.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEQT.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 13.14% | 18.84% | 27.38% | 6.47% |
CBCX.TO CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD | 18.36% | 21.63% | 82.92% | 54.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEQT.TO and CBCX.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEQT.TO vs. CBCX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CEQT.TO
CBCX.TO
CEQT.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) and CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD (CBCX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEQT.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.03 | 1.21 | +0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.44 | 1.22 | +3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.96 | 2.25 | +15.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEQT.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05 | 1.08 | +1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.67 | 0.49 | +1.18 |
Drawdowns
CEQT.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, smaller than the maximum CBCX.TO drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEQT.TO and CBCX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEQT.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.02% | -55.21% | +41.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -54.19% | +46.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | -55.21% | +41.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -28.01% | +28.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -23.79% | +22.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 29.19% | -27.40% |
Volatility
CEQT.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) is 3.70%, while CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD (CBCX.TO) has a volatility of 15.15%. This indicates that CEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBCX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEQT.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 15.15% | -11.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 40.52% | -31.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | 61.37% | -50.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 62.67% | -49.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 62.67% | -49.56% |
Dividends
CEQT.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Dividend Comparison
CEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than CBCX.TO's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBCX.TO CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD | 0.08% | 0.14% | 0.13% | 0.06% |
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 0.90% | 1.25% | 1.82% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEQT.TO and CBCX.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEQT.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CBCX.TO is Blockchain.
Find the right allocation for CEQT.TO and CBCX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer