CEPI vs. FLYD

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) and FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both exchange-traded funds - CEPI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while FLYD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. CEPI is actively managed, while FLYD is passively managed. Over the past year, CEPI returned 21.57% vs -50.80% for FLYD. Their -0.54 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CEPI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FLYD.

Performance

CEPI vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEPI achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than FLYD's -35.79% return.

CEPI

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 2.09%
• 6M: 17.67%
• YTD: 18.92%
• 1Y: 21.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.94%

FLYD

• 1D: -4.90%
• 1M: -5.05%
• 6M: -41.66%
• YTD: -35.79%
• 1Y: -50.80%
• 3Y*: -55.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -63.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF	$1.24M	$1.26M	$1.60M
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	$99.59K	$120.72K	$126.93K

CEPI vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF	18.92%	10.75%	-7.02%
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-35.79%	-60.42%	13.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CEPI and FLYD is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	-0.54

The correlation between CEPI and FLYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.54 to -0.45 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CEPI vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CEPI

CEPI Risk / Return Rank: 28
CEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FLYD

FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 3
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CEPI vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEPI	FLYD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	-0.66	+1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	-0.71	+1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.92	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	-0.89	+1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.24	-1.66	+3.90

CEPI vs. FLYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEPI Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the FLYD Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEPI and FLYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CEPI vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEPI drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEPI and FLYD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEPI	FLYD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.48%	-98.52%	+69.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.47%	-57.09%	+34.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-94.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.56%	-98.52%	+93.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.22%	-83.66%	+75.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.65%	30.58%	-20.93%

Volatility

CEPI vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) is 11.17%, while MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a volatility of 22.74%. This indicates that CEPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEPI	FLYD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.17%	22.74%	-11.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.73%	64.36%	-40.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.34%	76.85%	-47.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.88%	83.52%	-51.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.88%	83.52%	-51.64%

CEPI vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEPI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FLYD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEPI vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison

CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.15%, while FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF	44.15%	50.78%
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEPI and FLYD in my portfolio?

CEPI and FLYD have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CEPI or FLYD?

FLYD has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to CEPI (11.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEPI dropped -29.48% vs FLYD's -98.52%.

Which ETF is better, CEPI or FLYD?

On 1-year performance, CEPI leads with 21.57% vs -50.80% for FLYD. On fees, CEPI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, CEPI has been the lower-risk option at 11.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CEPI or FLYD?

Over the 1-year period, CEPI has performed better with a 21.57% return vs -50.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEPI or FLYD?

CEPI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FLYD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CEPI or FLYD?

CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 44.15%, compared with 0.00% for FLYD.

What is the main difference between CEPI and FLYD?

CEPI is categorized as Derivative Income, while FLYD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CEPI and 0.95% for FLYD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.