CEPI vs. EZBC
CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. CEPI is actively managed, while EZBC is passively managed. Over the past year, CEPI returned 34.07% vs -38.68% for EZBC. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEPI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.
Performance
CEPI vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEPI achieves a 20.71% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -25.36% return.
CEPI
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 18.40%
- 1Y
- 34.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -18.42%
- YTD
- -25.36%
- 6M
- -29.82%
- 1Y
- -38.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEPI vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 20.71% | 10.75% | -9.02% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -25.36% | -6.56% | -5.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEPI and EZBC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between CEPI and EZBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEPI vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank
CEPI
EZBC
CEPI vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEPI | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.86 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | -0.79 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.62 | -1.36 | +4.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEPI | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | -0.89 | +2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.30 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
CEPI vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEPI drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEPI and EZBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEPI | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.48% | -49.37% | +19.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.47% | -49.37% | +26.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -48.04% | +45.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -16.01% | +7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.43% | 28.42% | -18.99% |
Volatility
CEPI vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) is 5.92%, while Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that CEPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEPI | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 9.43% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.94% | 34.44% | -13.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.79% | 43.67% | -16.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.57% | 50.06% | -18.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.57% | 50.06% | -18.49% |
CEPI vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEPI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEPI vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison
CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.71%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 42.71% | 50.78% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEPI and EZBC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZBC has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to CEPI (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEPI dropped -29.48% vs EZBC's -49.37%.
On 1-year performance, CEPI leads with 34.07% vs -38.68% for EZBC. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, CEPI has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CEPI has performed better with a 34.07% return vs -38.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CEPI.
CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 42.71%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CEPI and 0.19% for EZBC.
CEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEPI and EZBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer