CEPI vs. ARMW
CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CEPI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
CEPI vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEPI achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 184.82% return.
CEPI
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 17.67%
- YTD
- 18.92%
- 1Y
- 21.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.94%
ARMW
- 1D
- 21.87%
- 1M
- -13.39%
- 6M
- 202.81%
- YTD
- 184.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.27M | $4.47M | $4.19M | |
| $1.24M | $1.26M | $1.60M |
CEPI vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 18.92% | -7.88% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 184.82% | -41.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEPI and ARMW is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEPI vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
CEPI
ARMW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CEPI vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEPI | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEPI vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEPI drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEPI and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEPI | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.48% | -56.50% | +27.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -42.68% | +38.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -27.39% | +19.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.65% | — | — |
Volatility
CEPI vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEPI | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.34% | 98.62% | -69.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.88% | 98.62% | -66.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.88% | 98.62% | -66.74% |
CEPI vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEPI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEPI vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.15%, less than ARMW's 54.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 54.31% | 16.38% |
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 44.15% | 50.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEPI and ARMW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEPI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEPI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 54.31%, compared with 44.15% for CEPI.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CEPI and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for CEPI and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer