ENGW.L vs. PPH
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH).
ENGW.L and PPH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ENGW.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. PPH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both ENGW.L and PPH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ENGW.L or PPH.
Correlation
The correlation between ENGW.L and PPH is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ENGW.L vs. PPH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ENGW.L:
-0.60
PPH:
0.13
ENGW.L:
-0.67
PPH:
0.27
ENGW.L:
0.91
PPH:
1.04
ENGW.L:
-0.58
PPH:
0.11
ENGW.L:
-1.55
PPH:
0.25
ENGW.L:
7.95%
PPH:
7.56%
ENGW.L:
20.71%
PPH:
15.12%
ENGW.L:
-21.65%
PPH:
-46.49%
ENGW.L:
-16.85%
PPH:
-11.04%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENGW.L achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly lower than PPH's 1.61% return.
ENGW.L
-6.01%
-12.83%
-6.95%
-11.97%
N/A
N/A
PPH
1.61%
-1.77%
-3.54%
0.96%
10.00%
3.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENGW.L vs. PPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENGW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PPH's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ENGW.L vs. PPH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ENGW.L
PPH
ENGW.L vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ENGW.L vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison
ENGW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PPH VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% | 1.71% |
Drawdowns
ENGW.L vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENGW.L drawdown since its inception was -21.65%, smaller than the maximum PPH drawdown of -46.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGW.L and PPH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ENGW.L vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) has a higher volatility of 13.07% compared to VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) at 9.76%. This indicates that ENGW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.